>
> Incidentally, this bodes well for me, and I hope NYU is taking notes.
>

I know this is a little late, but I just wanted to say that if you disagree
with the RIAA's actions (as presumably most of us do) then I'm curious as to
how you ethically defend file-sharing RIAA affiliated music and hoping to
not get caught.  If you think the RIAA's actions are unlawful or
unconstitutional, it is your civic duty as a citizen of this country to
challenge them in court (that is, intentionally get caught and fight it.)
If you don't feel like you can challenge the constitutionality of the laws
the RIAA hides behind, then you should boycott all music and artists
affiliated with the RIAA and loudly support (and share) the music of artists
and labels that you feel are doing things correctly.  I have a hard time
seeing any other choice of actions as ethically sound, but I'm willing to
hear an argument in opposition if you have one.

angel.

On Nov 3, 2007 9:34 AM, Parker Higgins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> The University of Oregon just became the first institution in this whole
> RIAA mess to not hand over the suspected file-sharers names when served with
> a subpoena.  Part of their rationale was that five of the John Does lived in
> double dorm rooms, and so there's no way of knowing which student the RIAA
> is looking for, or even if it were a visitor.  (Incidentally, this bodes
> well for me, and I hope NYU is taking notes.)  The really cool thing is that
> the State AG is totally behind the school in filing the motion.  What I'm
> wondering is whether (and how) this is substantially different, in a
> technical sense, from the Jammie Thomas case: both she and the university
> (on behalf of the students) argue that there's no way of identifying the
> actual human being behind the IP address.  Could the RIAA find more
> information without the help of U of O, or are they effectively shut down
> here?
>
> Slashdot:
> http://yro.slashdot.org/yro/07/11/02/1317240.shtml
>
> RIAA v. People:
>
> http://recordingindustryvspeople.blogspot.com/2007/11/oregon-attorney-general-says-no-to-riaa.html
>
> -Parker (Higgins)
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
>
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to