Writes Asheesh Laroia on our blog: I read a [Slashdot article][1] a few moments ago that links to an [NYTimes blog post][2] by David Pogue discussing in stark terms a gap in how college students see copyright law when compared to the author. The discussion on the post is marvelous; one commenter brings up John Tehranian's recent paper, "Infringement Nation: Copyright Reform and the Law/Norm Gap" ([PDF][3]). This paper assesses the daily legal liability of everyday actions of a hypothetical law professor:
> All told, he has committed at least eighty-three acts of infringement and faces liability in the amount of $12.45 million (to say nothing of potential criminal charges). There is nothing particularly extraordinary about John’s activities. The sharp commenter continues: > The point is that copyright law is way behind what is the norm in actual day-to-day life, and part of it is that “fair use” is not part of the law, it’s part of case law, which is far behind practice. Pogue at the New York Times illustrates what we have long hoped: Many students already believe in some of the things Students for Free Culture does. We want a culture "[where all members are free to participate in its transmission and evolution, without artificial limits on who can participate or in what way][4]." I personally think that the best way to pull people into the future of a culture based on sharing is not to simply take without asking, as in the "download a DVD without permission" example, but to both (1) make people understand the value of sharing their work, and (2) supporting those that do, like the growing numbers of people sharing their creative work under permissive licenses; many of our chapters agree. We have dozens of active chapters today. Somehow the work we have done has often seemed distant or academic, perhaps deservedly. But sometimes we've made our points in brutally obvious ways, from like [Barbie in a Blender][5] or [Cereal Solidarity][6] to newer projects like the [Day of Action for Open Access][7] to scholarly literature. Unified by a vision of sharing and openness, our students fight for their own rights to share their own work, argue that their universities and colleges could share more with the world, and explain why more access to knowledge and culture would be good public policy. On more personal notes: To all who have participated in chapters of Students for Free Culture, or worked with us on events, or helped organize other chapters (like me, our humble [web team leader][8]): Thanks. It's refreshing to see our active members range from the pre-historic Nelson, whose first Free Culture chapter was founded before the name "Free Culture" described us, all the way to people like Tim who started his chapter this calendar year. I'm personally proud that we're continuing the tradition of drawing from a broad group of students: filmmakers, technologists, law students, and artists, just to name a few labels. To [Downhill Battle][9]: I miss your [inspiring work][10] and your amazing name. To Jesus: Happy Birthday today ([observed][11]). [1]: http://yro.slashdot.org/yro/07/12/24/2138202.shtml [2]: http://pogue.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/12/20/the-generational- divide-in-copyright-morality/ [3]: http://www.turnergreen.com/publications/Tehranian_Infringement_N ation.pdf [4]: http://freeculture.org/ [5]: http://barbieinablender.org/ [6]: http://freeculture.org/cereal/ [7]: http://freeculture.org/blog/2007/02/15/events-for-national-day- of-action-for-open-access/ [8]: http://freeculture.org/about/ [9]: http://www.downhillbattle.org/ [10]: http://www.downhillbattle.org/itunes/ [11]: http://www.bwog.net/articles/ask_bwog_early_holiday_cheer URL: http://freeculture.org/blog/2007/12/25/supporting-free-culture-on-campus-should-be-a-downhill-battle/ _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
