-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

FreeCulture.org - Students for Free Culture wrote:
> Writes Nelson Pavlosky on our blog:
> 
> Do you feel that Hasbro's lawsuit against [Scrabulous][1] was rather
> heavy-handed? Did you enjoy Scrabulous's revival of a 60-year-old game,
> and do you resent Hasbro's [free-riding off of the innovators who made
> Scrabulous][2]? Is it uncool that Hasbro used Scrabulous to make
> Scrabble more popular, and then sued the Scrabulous developers once
> Hasbro developed an official Facebook app?
> 
> Then perhaps it is time that you began boycotting Hasbro's Scrabble, in
> all its forms. Why not:
> 
>   * **Refuse to use official Scrabble online games -** Let's face it,
> they're [not as good as Scrabulous was][3], anyway. You can join the
> Facebook group [We refuse to use official Scrabble app since Hasbro shut
> down Scrabulous][4] or probably a dozen others like it.
> 
>   * **Continue playing Scrabulous anyway - **Hasbro does not own the
> copyrights to Scrabble outside the USA and Canada, some other company
> does. So, if you connect to Facebook from an IP address located outside
> the US and Canada, then you can continue playing Scrabulous just like
> the good old days. [This Facebook group][5] has easy instructions on how
> to do so, by connecting to Facebook through a proxy server. A silver
> lining to this lawsuit might be getting more people using the [Firefox
> web browser][6] and the [FoxyProxy][7] add-on.
> 
>   * **Avoid buying products from Hasbro - **Do you really need a new
> Scrabble board? Aren't there a gazillion Scrabble boards floating around
> people's attics and garage sales that you could pick up for a song? Same
> thing goes for other Hasbro games! Exercise your first sale rights and
> buy used games instead.
> 
>   * **If you have a Scrabble board, don't play Scrabble on it, play a
> different word game -** What's so good about the exact copyrighted
> version of Scrabble anyway? The Scrabulous developers realized this and
> [released the more flexible Wordscraper][8], a Scrabble-esque game that
> lets you change the board/rules. If you have a physical Scrabble board,
> there are innumerable word games you could play with it. You could use
> the tiles to play [Anagrams][9], a lovely fast-paced party game that
> predates Scrabble, or perhaps even [Bananagrams][10]. Or, create your
> own entirely new word game, and go down in history as the inventor of
> something even better than Scrabble!
> 
>   * **Make your own Scrabble-esque boards -** Why buy it when you can
> make it yourself? The tiles might be a bit tricky (although a [RepRap 3d
> printer][11] would probably make short work of it once it's generally
> available to the public) but it should be child's play to draw a grid
> and fill in the boxes with double word scores or more interesting
> variations.
> 
> Honestly, Hasbro's rent-seeking with the Scrabble copyright is a really
> annoying example of how copyright can hinder creativity rather than
> encouraging it. Scrabble was invented in 1938, and sold by the creator
> in 1948 to someone who could commercialize it (not Hasbro, Hasbro bought
> the copyright much later around 1986). How much real innovation has been
> done since then with Scrabble by people who benefit from the copyright
> royalties? Isn't it telling that the innovators here innovated without
> benefiting from copyright controls or copyright royalties? This is a
> clear case of copyright outlasting its usefulness. Perhaps more
> importantly, I think it's rotten that Hasbro is shutting down Scrabulous
> for bringing Scrabble to life again for a new generation… that's not a
> proper reward. I'd love to send a message to Hasbro that their behavior
> is really uncool. Just because Hasbro has the legal power to shut down
> Scrabulous doesn't mean it's the right thing to do, either for their
> bottom line (see [the Economist's cautious endorsement of piracy][12])
> or for creativity in the field of gaming.
> 
>    [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scrabulous
> 
>    [2]: http://freedomforip.org/2008/07/31/hasbro-v-scrabulous-tm-in-a
> -user-generated-world/
> 
>    [3]:
> http://games.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/07/29/1455219&tid=202
> 
>    [4]: http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=25544341610&ref=nf
> 
>    [5]: http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=22388656294&ref=nf
> 
>    [6]: http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/
> 
>    [7]: http://foxyproxy.mozdev.org/
> 
>    [8]: http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080731-scrabulous-goes-
> for-bonus-points-relaunches-as-wordscraper.html
> 
>    [9]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anagrams
> 
>    [10]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bananagrams
> 
>    [11]: http://reprap.org/
> 
>    [12]:
> http://www.economist.com/opinion/displaystory.cfm?story_id=11750492
> 
> URL: 
> http://freeculture.org/blog/2008/07/31/ideas-for-boycotting-scrabble-and-hasbro/
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Cool ideas, I'm certainly never using the official version anymore. I
with the developers would release the source code so we could to a mass
civil disobedience : (
CRK
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFIkoHXmBTzXUpNYqQRAk5RAJ9favcTm1FAkLjWBKlkJ2iXHXOP0gCgua0b
w3TKmVyCnIlIT6Pgs9VlbfI=
=EKU3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to