(I believe this is exactly the sort of victory we need.  The EU
Parliament has stood up for the sovereignty of the many states within
the EU, and the sovereignty of the people in those states, by standing
up for their fundamental rights, over the supercession of those rights
by transnational bodies dedicated in general to principles of market
efficiency, without appropriate regard for concerns of sovereignty. 
While the rest of this law was problematic to say the least, I believe
the resistance on the one principle of not allowing invasions of
privacy without judicial findings of cause, held back what must have
been the key thing for those pursuing the overall law, to strengthen
the principle that their purposes may dominate the proceedings when
enacting these kinds of rules.  I can't help but believe this shows
the magnitude of what the software patent fight achieved -- the EU
Parliament apparently now recognizes that whatever their appropriate
role must be, they serve the people.)


> http://news.idg.no/cw/art.cfm?id=16272025-1A64-6A71-CE42CECA725771BA


Reform of EU telecom laws rejected by European Parliament


Paul Meller

06.05.2009 kl 13:23


Wide-ranging reforms of European Union telecom laws were rejected by
the European Parliament on Wednesday because of one clause that would
have compromised citizens' rights of access to the Internet.

The reforms were designed to take account of advances in technology
and the rapid growth of high speed Internet access.

The Parliament supported all other aspects of the reforms, including
the creation of an E.U.-wide telecommunications regulator with powers
to police competition in the single market, a plan for distributing
radio spectrum among emerging mobile technologies, and enhancing
citizens' privacy rights online data protection.

However, failure to agree one element in the so-called telecom package
of legislation means the whole reform is stalled, Members of the
European Parliament (MEPs) said after the vote in Strasbourg, France,
on Wednesday.

Initial reactions to the vote lauded the MEPs for not bowing to
pressure from national governments, in particular France and the U.K.,
which wanted greater power to restrict people's internet access if
they are found to have been downloading copyright content illegally.

The cable industry was one of the first to react.

"This is ultimately a consumer issue and the European Parliament stood
up to be counted on behalf of its citizens and our 70 million European
customers," said Manuel Kohnstam, president of the trade group Cable
Europe.

"Europe has chosen to ignore a reflex to police the net in the name of
one business model. In the end, there was support to protect the
European fundamental right to access information," he said.

Representatives of the European Commission, which wrote the reforms
and pushed hard for their adoption in recent weeks, weren't
immediately available to comment. Telecom Commissioner Viviane Reding
will hold a news conference later Wednesday, together with key MEPs
involved in the law reform effort.

Some observers still believe the bulk of the reforms can be adopted
even without support for the full package. However, representatives
for the Commission and the Parliament were not immediately available
to confirm this.

The failure to adopt the whole package came as a surprise to many
observers, who believed the reform package was "in the bag", as one
person close to Reding put it.

_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to