I think it's also about demand -- articulating what "open" is to pre-college
students is one thing, establishing to the publishers that its a criterion
that students will be evaluating universities on is another story.

So I think the best is to have the data first, establish the demand, and
then make the pitch to the publications.

But I love the scale of your thinking, Matt.

:)

F


~ ~ ~
thoughts / http://fredbenenson.com/blog
work / http://creativecommons.org
sights / http://flickr.com/fcb
sounds / http://www.last.fm/user/mecredis
status / http://twitter.com/mecredis



On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 3:01 PM, Samuel Klein <[email protected]> wrote:

> It's been many years since grenness started being a common idea in activist
> circles for an institution.  Once we've put out an independent assessment
> and demonstated what sorts of metrics might be used -- and agreed on a
> couple of them as fundamental -- people that hand out awards will have
> something to work with.
>
> Getting a small consortium of friednly orgs to support/sponsor/write about
> the first report card on universities will help.  I could see some of them
> helping gather data - herdict might help cover censorship, cc might help
> cover licensing, a major OA group might cover journal access and publishing
> standards.
>
> SJ
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 9:16 PM, Adi Kamdar <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I know the Princeton Review rates "greenness" as well.
>> http://www.princetonreview.com/green/press-release.aspx
>>
>> The problem I'm foreseeing is that sustainability is much more
>> well-politicized issue than openness. It seems obvious that these ranking
>> magazines picked that up, but it may be a while before openness is
>> considered. I think this is the big reason why we should focus on tackling
>> the preliminary rankings ourselves, show that it can be done, show how it
>> can be done, and show why it's important. Plus, instead of having other
>> organizations collect and publish findings (something that may not happen at
>> all), we should find out and publish what we can (something that we can make
>> sure happens).
>>
>> -Adi
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 8:58 PM, Matthew Senate 
>> <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>> I hate to bump this message, but I'd really like to get a response or
>>> some
>>> feedback about this idea.
>>>
>>> Any thoughts? Newsweek is just one, there are many more serious rankings
>>> that need to take OA, OERs, and the like into consideration. Are there
>>> any
>>> already? What do we know?
>>>
>>> - Matt
>>>
>>>
>>> > One of the s...@berkeley members (Michael Lissner) suggested an
>>> > interesting strategy to better distribute the labor of evaluating
>>> > Universities' "Openness." He suggested convincing groups that already
>>> > review and rank schools to include "Openness" in their evaluations. He
>>> > suggested for example
>>> > getting people like Newsweek to include "Openness" just as they are
>>> > beginning to include "Greenness."
>>> >
>>> > We should put together a reasonable and convincing argument that
>>> describes
>>> > what "Openness" is, which would be similar to the "report cards"
>>> project
>>> > below. But instead of simply implementing this on our own, we should
>>> > pressure other groups to see:
>>> > 1. Students actually care about these issues
>>> > 2. Openness is an important aspect of any institution whose purpose
>>> > includes public service
>>> > 3. Given the technology and media now at our disposal, universities
>>> have
>>> > the responsibility to realize to the best of their ability the full
>>> > productive potential of these tools in the name of education and
>>> freedom
>>> >
>>> > Note that Openness is perhaps not the best term, since it could be
>>> > confused with Transparency (which is another metric that should be
>>> > included in evaluating universities--but that's a battle for another
>>> day).
>>> >
>>> > - Matt
>>> > s...@berkeley
>>> >
>>> >> Writes Kevin Donovan on our blog:
>>> >>
>>> >> As many of you know, following the Free Culture 2008 Conference,
>>> >> Students for Free Culture began the Open University Campaign - an
>>> >> initiative to increase collaboration, sharing, and openness at the
>>> level
>>> >> of higher education. With the academic year about to begin, we want to
>>> >> invite all interested parties to assist the with project; after all,
>>> we
>>> >> wouldn't be very genuine if we didn't do this in an open manner
>>> >> ourselves!
>>> >>
>>> >> ![Oucmini][1]
>>> >>
>>> >> **About the Open University Campaign**
>>> >>
>>> >> In October 2008, Students for Free Culture drafted and adopted the
>>> >> Wheeler Declaration which declared that:
>>> >>
>>> >> _
>>> >>
>>> >> "An open university is one in which:_
>>> >>
>>> >> _1. The research produced is open access;
>>> >>
>>> >> 2. The course materials are open educational resources;
>>> >>
>>> >> 3. The university embraces free software and open standards;
>>> >>
>>> >> 4. The university's patents are readily licensed for free software,
>>> >> essential medicine, and the public good;
>>> >>
>>> >> 5. The university's network reflects the open nature of the Internet,_
>>> >>
>>> >> _where "university" includes all parts of the community: students,
>>> >> faculty and administration."_
>>> >>
>>> >> Out of this agreement has grown the Open University Campaign, of which
>>> a
>>> >> major goal is to produce objective, reliable indicators of individual
>>> >> universities' levels of openness. A primary method through which this
>>> >> will be accomplished is through "report card" style profiles of
>>> leading
>>> >> institution of higher learning, similar to [College Sustainability
>>> >> Report Cards][2]. Students for Free Culture has already begun this
>>> work
>>> >> by defining principles of measurement, researching available
>>> resources,
>>> >> and developing surveys to be distributed to universities.
>>> >>
>>> >> **What Will the Open University Report Cards Entail?**
>>> >>
>>> >> Mirroring the Wheeler Declaration, the Open University Report Cards,
>>> as
>>> >> currently envisioned, will evaluate schools on five topics:
>>> >>
>>> >> 1. Open Access: Are faculty required to make their scholarship open
>>> >> access? Is the university press publish open access materials?
>>> >>
>>> >> 2. Open Educational Resources: Does the university create OERs? Does
>>> the
>>> >> university use OERs?
>>> >>
>>> >> 3. Free and Open Source Software and Standards: Does university
>>> >> computing use FOSS? Are students and faculty required to use
>>> proprietary
>>> >> software?
>>> >>
>>> >> 4. Intellectual Property: Is IP revenue transparent? Is IP used to
>>> >> promote innovation, or restrict knowledge?
>>> >>
>>> >> 5. Network Management: Is the network neutral? Is user privacy
>>> >> respected?
>>> >>
>>> >> Establishing credible criteria under which schools will be assessed
>>> will
>>> >> be essential to creating a respected resource. For example, Which
>>> >> schools' open access policies are currently lacking important
>>> criteria?
>>> >> Or, To what extent should a school actively support FOSS? The
>>> volunteers
>>> >> currently involved with the project are working through these
>>> questions
>>> >> on [the wiki page, and we encourage you to join the conversation][3].
>>> >>
>>> >> **What the Open University Campaign Needs**
>>> >>
>>> >> In order to make this a successful endeavor, Students for Free Culture
>>> >> needs your involvement!
>>> >>
>>> >>   * Are you a student who can _research official university [open
>>> access
>>> >> policies][4]_?
>>> >>
>>> >>   * Are you passionate about FOSS and can _develop a [questionnaire
>>> for
>>> >> IT administrators about FOSS policy][5]_?
>>> >>
>>> >>   * Are you statistically-inclined and can _handle data on
>>> >> universities_?
>>> >>
>>> >>   * Are you a web developer who could _create a public website for the
>>> >> Open University Report Cards_?
>>> >>
>>> >>   * Are you a graphic designer who could _create posters to raise
>>> >> awareness on campuses_?
>>> >>
>>> >> **In Closing…**
>>> >>
>>> >> The Open University Campaign recognizes that scholastic advancement
>>> >> occurs most readily in an environment of sharing, openness and
>>> >> collaboration. By providing a cross-index of leading universities, the
>>> >> project will add important comparative measurements to encourage
>>> >> increased academic openness. Our hope is that these resources will
>>> >> provide a platform from which openness activists can endeavor to
>>> improve
>>> >> the scholastic environment.
>>> >>
>>> >> Join us by jumping into the [wiki][3], signing up for the [Open
>>> >> University mailing list][6], or emailing board (at) freeculture (dot)
>>> >> org with suggestions or questions!
>>> >>
>>> >>    [1]: http://freeculture.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/Oucmini.jpg
>>> >> (Oucmini)
>>> >>
>>> >>    [2]: http://greenreportcard.org/
>>> >>
>>> >>    [3]: http://wiki.freeculture.org/Open_University_Report_Cards
>>> >>
>>> >>    [4]:
>>> >> http://wiki.freeculture.org/Open_University_Report_Cards_Open_Access
>>> >>
>>> >>    [5]:
>>> http://wiki.freeculture.org/Open_University_Report_Cards_Survey
>>> >>
>>> >>    [6]:
>>> http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openuniversity
>>> >>
>>> >> URL:
>>> >>
>>> http://freeculture.org/blog/2009/10/27/call-for-participation-join-the-open-university-campaign/
>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>> >> Discuss mailing list
>>> >> [email protected]
>>> >> http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > Discuss mailing list
>>> > [email protected]
>>> > http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Discuss mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Discuss mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
>
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to