an update:
http://www.librarytechnology.org/ltg-displaytext.pl?RC=14533
On Feb 6, 2010, at 12:12 AM, Matthew Senate wrote:
I think the article comments characterize the issue very well.
Essentially, as I understand it, UCLA has some kind of
student-only-accessible video service that allows professors to host
video
(including movies) for the students in their classes, so that they can
screen the video, for which the university has already paid
royalties. The
contention is then that this mode of sharing the video violates the
copyright holders' rights, as represented by a trade group.
- Matt
SFC Berkeley
This is ludicrous. I think. Is the issue that they're posting their
videos
which include other people's videos or videos of their own
lectures, etc?
~ ~ ~
thoughts / http://fredbenenson.com/blog
work / http://kickstarter.com
sights / http://flickr.com/fcb
sounds / http://www.last.fm/user/mecredis
status / http://twitter.com/mecredis
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 6:35 PM, Matthew Senate
<[email protected]>wrote:
Perhaps this will be protected by the misrepresentations clause
[512(f)]
of the DMCA. Extremely frustrating and silly, though. I wonder if
the
Open
Video Alliance has caught wind of this. I'll send it through the
Free
Culture Pipeline.
http://www.dailybruin.com/articles/2010/1/25/ucla-professors-banned-posting-videos-online/
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
