I'm going to give the benefit of the doubt to the writer, who probably wrote "IP-rights" and had a clueless editor expand out the acronym, but this sentence came across as particularly ridiculous:
"Although these moves are encouraging, however, we still see numerous opportunities for Internet Protocol-rights holders to expand in the Internet space, particularly in sports programming and back-catalogue access to popular television programs." P On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 6:42 AM, Parker <[email protected]> wrote: > > http://www.thecrimson.com/article/2010/12/13/universities-intellectual-copyright-unauthorized/ > chat it up here and in the comments there. > > And if someone wants to write a good response, we'll put it up on the > national blog! > > -- > http://www.madebyparker.com > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss > FAQ: http://wiki.freeculture.org/Fc-discuss > -- parker higgins berlin, germany http://parkerhiggins.net gmail / gchat: [email protected] twitter / identi.ca: @thisisparker skype: thisisparker please consider software freedom before reading this e-mail on a proprietary platform
_______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss FAQ: http://wiki.freeculture.org/Fc-discuss
