thank you moderators ;)

On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 1:28 PM, Alec Story <[email protected]> wrote:

> [email protected] now requires moderator approval for new postings.
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 4:14 PM, Karl Fogel 
> <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> Fred Benenson <[email protected]> writes:
>> >uhh
>>
>> Does someone have admin privs for
>>
>>  http://lists.freeculture.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>
>> ?  No reason to think hard about this: that sender ([email protected])
>> should simply not be able to send to the list anymore, period.
>>
>> -K
>>
>>
>> >~ ~ ~
>> >thoughts / http://fredbenenson.com/blog
>> >work / http://kickstarter.com
>> >sights / http://flickr.com/fcb
>> >sounds / http://www.last.fm/user/mecredis
>> >status / http://twitter.com/mecredis
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 5:45 PM, Jill Louise Starr
>> ><[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >        Irrefutable Proof ICTY Is Corrupt Court/Irrefutable Proof the
>> >    Hague Court Cannot Legitimately Prosecute Karadzic Case
>> >
>> >    posted Oct 5, 2009 10:02 AM by Jill Starr   [ updated Jan 22, 2011
>> >    2:37 AM ]
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >       Delicious Digg Facebook Reddit Stumble Upon Technorati Mixx
>> >       Sphinn Twitter SphereIt Propeller Gmarks Newsvine Yahoo! My Web
>> >       Live Journal Blinklist E-mail
>> >
>> >       Photo 7631 of 7631   Back to Album · My Photos
>> >
>> >       * Previous
>> >
>> >       * Next
>> >
>> >
>> >        Click on people's faces in the
>> >        photo to tag them.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >     Irrefutable Proof ICTY Is Corrupt Court/Irrefutable Proof the Hague
>> >     Court Cannot
>> >     Legitimately Prosecute Karadzic Case
>> >
>> >     http://picasaweb.google.com/lpcyusa
>> >
>> >
>> https://picasaweb.google.com/lpcyusa/IrrefutableProofICTYIsCorruptCo
>> >     urtIrrefutabl#
>> >     (The Documentary Secret United Nations ICC Meeting Papers Scanned
>> >     Images)
>> >
>> >
>> >     This legal technicality indicates the Hague must dismiss charges
>> >     against Dr Karadzic and
>> >     others awaiting trials in the Hague jail; like it or not.
>> >
>> >     Unfortunately for the Signatures Of the Rome Statute United Nations
>> >     member states
>> >     instituting the ICC & ICTY housed at the Hague, insofar as the,
>> >     Radovan Karadzic, as
>> >     with the other Hague cases awaiting trial there, I personally
>> >     witnessed these United
>> >     Nations member states having a substantial conversation and openly
>> >     speaking about trading judicial appointments and verdicts for
>> >     financial funding when I attended the 2001 ICC Preparatory Meetings
>> >     at the UN in Manhattan making the iCTY and ICC morally incapable
>> >     trying Radovan Karazdic and others.
>> >
>> >     I witnessed with my own eyes and ears when attending the 2001
>> >     Preparatory Meetings to
>> >     establish an newly emergent International Criminal Court, the exact
>> >     caliber of criminal
>> >     corruption running so very deeply at the Hague, that it was a
>> >     perfectly viable topic of
>> >     legitimate conversation in those meetings I attended to debate
>> >     trading verdicts AND
>> >     judicial appointments, for monetary funding.
>> >
>> >     Jilly wrote:*The rep from Spain became distraught and when her
>> >     country’s proposal was
>> >     not taken to well by the chair of the meeting , then Spain argued in
>> >     a particularly loud
>> >     and noticably strongly vocal manner, “Spain (my country) strongly
>> >     believes if we
>> >     contribute most financial support to the Hague’s highest court, that
>> >     ought to give us and
>> >     other countries feeding it financially MORE direct power over its
>> >     decisions.”
>> >
>> >     ((((((((((((((((((((((((( ((((((((((((((((((((((((( Instead of
>> >     censoring the country representative
>> >     from Spain for even bringing up this unjust, illegal and unfair
>> >     judicial idea of bribery for
>> >     international judicial verdicts and judicial appointments, all
>> >     country representatives
>> >     present in the meeting that day all treated the Spain proposition as
>> >     a ”totally legitimate
>> >     topic” discussed and debated it between each other for some time. I
>> >     was quite shocked!
>> >     The idea was "let's discuss it." "It's a great topic to discuss."
>> >
>> >     Some countries agreed with Spain’s propositions while others did
>> >     not. The point here is,
>> >     bribery for judicial verdicts and judicial appointments was treated
>> >     as a totally legitimate
>> >     topic instead of an illegitimate toic which it is in the meeting
>> >     that I
>> >     attended in 2001 that day to establish the ground work for a newly
>> >     emergent
>> >     international criminal court.))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
>> >
>> >     In particular., since "Spain" was so overtly unafraid in bringing up
>> >     this topic of trading
>> >     financial funding the ICC for influence over its future judicial
>> >     appointments and verdicts
>> >     in front of every other UN member state present that day at the UN,
>> >     "Spain" must have
>> >     already known by previous experience the topic of bribery was
>> >     "socially acceptable" for
>> >     conversation that day. They must have previously spoke about bribing
>> >     the ICTY and ICC
>> >     before in meetings; this is my take an international sociological
>> >     honor student.
>> >
>> >     SPAIN's diplomatic gesture of international justice insofar as,
>> >     Serbia, in all of this is,
>> >     disgusting morally!
>> >
>> >     SPAIN HAS TAUGHT THE WORLD THE TRUE DEFINITION OF AN
>> >     "INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT."
>> >
>> >     I remind everyone, when I attended those ICC Preparatory Meetings in
>> >     2001, witnessing
>> >     first hand the country plenipotentiary representatives present with
>> >     me discussing so
>> >     openly, trading judicial funding of a new international criminal
>> >     court, for its direct
>> >     judicial appointments and judicial verdicts, those same state powers
>> >     were
>> >
>> >     concurrently,
>> >
>> >     those same countries and people were already simultaneously, funding
>> >     the already
>> >     established ICTY which was issuing at that time, arrest warrants for
>> >     Bosnian Serbs
>> >     under false primary diplomatic pretenses.
>> >
>> >     The ICTY and ICC is just where it should be for once.
>> >     Cornered and backed into and an international wall, scared like a
>> >     corned animal (and I
>> >     bet it reacts in the same way a rabid cornered animal does too in
>> >     such circumstances).
>> >     (ICTY associates)
>> >
>> >
>> http://picasaweb.google.com/lpcyusa/ViewMyHagueInternationalCriminal
>> >     CourtPreparat
>> >     oryDocumentsFromThe2001UnitedNations#
>> >     (Evidence Against the ICTY)
>> >
>> >
>> http://picasaweb.google.com/lpcyusa/DuringTheTrialOfRamushHaradinajI
>> >     n2006TheHag
>> >     ueWarCrimesTribunalForTheFormerYugoslavi#
>> >     (Documents: Hague war crimes tribunal for the former Yugoslavia
>> >     (ICTY) has destroyed
>> >     all material evidence about the monstrous KLA Albanian/KLA organ
>> >     trade in Kosovo)
>> >
>> >     I represented the state interests' of the Former Yugoslavia, in
>> >     Darko Trifunovic’s
>> >     absence in those meetings and I am proud to undertake this effort on
>> >     Serbia’s behalf.
>> >
>> >     ====================================================================
>> >     ==============
>> >     As totally immersed and interesting as I found the topics, the
>> >     African ambassador seated found boring. I say this owing to noticing
>> >     during the entire meeting he was merely doodling nonsensical
>> >     pictures on some legal pad. I think that no one took more notes that
>> >     day than me. I was especially interested in the interstate bickering
>> >     about financing the international criminal court should and when it
>> >     came about. Spain was particularly forceful in vocalizing its
>> >     opinion that the countries giving the most monetary contributions to
>> >     the court itself ought have more power over both its staffing and
>> >     its innocent and guilty verdicts as well as judges appointed. My
>> >     suspicions’ equally shared by scholars such as Noam Chomsky and
>> >     former attorney general, Ramsey Clark were now fully justifiably
>> >     confirmed. The court itself was a great travesty of justice and I
>> >     was actually witnessing quarrels between countries insofar as
>> >     controlling the courts judges and verdicts based on financial
>> >     contributions rather than on law and true international justice.
>> >
>> >     PART I->Additional Photo Documentary Evidence Against the ICTY Court
>> >     at the Hague
>> >
>> >     PART II- Additional Photo Documentary Evidence of ICTY Hague Court
>> >     Criminality
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >             Jill StarrCreate
>> >             your badge
>> >
>> >    Attachments (15)
>> >
>> >    * icc1.jpg - on Oct 31, 2009 7:27 PM by Jill Starr (version 1)
>> >      Remove
>> >      126k View Download
>> >
>> >    * icc2.jpg - on Oct 31, 2009 7:27 PM by Jill Starr (version 1)
>> >      Remove
>> >      169k View Download
>> >
>> >    * icc3.jpg - on Oct 31, 2009 7:28 PM by Jill Starr (version 1)
>> >      Remove
>> >      133k View Download
>> >
>> >    * icc4.jpg - on Oct 31, 2009 7:28 PM by Jill Starr (version 1)
>> >      Remove
>> >      159k View Download
>> >
>> >    * icc5.jpg - on Oct 31, 2009 7:28 PM by Jill Starr (version 1)
>> >      Remove
>> >      172k View Download
>> >
>> >    * icc6.jpg - on Oct 31, 2009 7:28 PM by Jill Starr (version 1)
>> >      Remove
>> >      168k View Download
>> >
>> >    * icc7.jpg - on Oct 31, 2009 7:28 PM by Jill Starr (version 1)
>> >      Remove
>> >      172k View Download
>> >
>> >    * icc88.jpg - on Oct 31, 2009 7:28 PM by Jill Starr (version 1)
>> >      Remove
>> >      157k View Download
>> >
>> >    * icc9.jpg - on Oct 31, 2009 7:29 PM by Jill Starr (version 1)
>> >      Remove
>> >      158k View Download
>> >
>> >    * iccanada1.jpg - on Oct 31, 2009 7:29 PM by Jill Starr (version
>> >      1) Remove
>> >      110k View Download
>> >
>> >    * iccanada2.jpg - on Oct 31, 2009 7:29 PM by Jill Starr (version
>> >      1) Remove
>> >      149k View Download
>> >
>> >    * iccanada3.jpg - on Oct 31, 2009 7:29 PM by Jill Starr (version
>> >      1) Remove
>> >      179k View Download
>> >
>> >    * icclast1.jpg - on Oct 31, 2009 7:29 PM by Jill Starr (version 1)
>> >      Remove
>> >      75k View Download
>> >
>> >    * iccolumbia1.jpg - on Oct 31, 2009 7:29 PM by Jill Starr (version
>> >      1) Remove
>> >      167k View Download
>> >
>> >    * iccolumbia2.jpg - on Oct 31, 2009 7:30 PM by Jill Starr (version
>> >      1) Remove
>> >      198k View Download
>> >
>> >        Top of Form
>> >
>> >    Attach a file:
>> >
>> >        Bottom of Form
>> >
>> >    Comments (2)
>> >
>> >    _displayNameOrEmail_ - _time_ - Remove
>> >
>> >    _text_
>> >
>> >    Jill Starr - Dec 19, 2009 10:06 AM - Remove
>> >
>> >    Several seasons went by and now it was spring 2001. Darko and his
>> >    wife Bojana had time off which they spent visiting friends and
>> >    family in Serbia for about two weeks. Because of this Darko was
>> >    unable to function in full diplomatic capacity. In spring 2001
>> >    there was a preparatory commission meeting of plenipotentiaries to
>> >    establish an international criminal court at the United Nations in
>> >    New York City. Topics of the meeting included but were not limited
>> >    to defining interstate acts of aggression, court financing etc..
>> >    Darko asked me if I would sit in for him at the meeting taking as
>> >    many notes possible owing to the Law Projects Center possessing
>> >    United Nations accreditation as a NGO (non governmental
>> >    organization) with full observer status at the United Nations; I
>> >    acceded.
>> >
>> >    Darko faxed me all necessary paperwork enabling my application
>> >    attendance at this crucial meeting; I filled out the necessary
>> >    forms and faxed them to the appropriate United Nations office for
>> >    approval. It was an extremely exciting time for me. My close
>> >    friend and colleague, Arnold Stark (History professor and
>> >    Columbian University PhD) drove me into Manhattan walking me
>> >    through the United Nations main entrance and security the day of
>> >    attendance. Professor Stark himself was an old foreign service man
>> >    from way back in the day and he told me I never looked as
>> >    professionally sharp as I did on that day; I wore a navy blue pin
>> >    striped suit. I must admit, I looked good.
>> >
>> >    Only post attending that day did I truly understand the total
>> >    lapse of security existing then at the United Nations in New York
>> >    City. I say this owing to the social fact that the Law Projects
>> >    Center was indeed registered as an United nations accredited NGO
>> >    it is true. However, closed meetings of this sort meant attendance
>> >    was strictly limited to head ambassadors of valid United Nations
>> >    member state missions and non governmental organizations
>> >    possessing observer status were not allowed.
>> >
>> >    Unto present, I’ve yet understood whereby I gained entrance into
>> >    this privy closed meeting consisting of only United Nations
>> >    ambassadors, but I did. Walking to the basement floor of the
>> >    United Nations building that day, I merely wore a visitors badge
>> >    given to me at the front desk in no manner indicating that I was
>> >    an ambassador of a United Nations mission; least of all the Bosnia
>> >    mission as required for entrance. Totally unaware I didn’t possess
>> >    necessary credentials to enter the meeting, I walked confidently
>> >    towards the entrance door and past the guard stationed outside it.
>> >    The guard never bothering to examine the type of badge I wore
>> >    around my neck simply said “good day Madame” and urged me into the
>> >    meeting; it was just about time to begin.
>> >
>> >    I immediately sensed something wrong once through the door past
>> >    the guard. First, I was uncertain where to sit. Everyone else had
>> >    a sign in front of their seat stating their country of origin. The
>> >    Israeli ambassador sat in front of the Israel sign, the Spanish
>> >    lady sat in front of the seat indicating she represented, Spain
>> >    etc..
>> >
>> >    I looked fervently around the room seeing no seats indicating
>> >    seats for United Nations observers anywhere. The last thing I
>> >    wanted to do was to embarrass myself by taking the seat of an
>> >    important ambassador; I noticed a couple of men seeming from some
>> >    African state grabbing some meeting paperwork nearby so I inquired
>> >    of them.
>> >    I told them I was a newbie and inquired where to sit and what I
>> >    should do. With heavy African accents one of them said, “just grab
>> >    a bunch of these papers, sit there and look like you are busy,” so
>> >    I did. In fact, I grabbed as many extra copies as I could without
>> >    looking conspicuous when noticing another peculiarity.
>> >
>> >    The meeting papers indicated they were for restricted for the eyes
>> >    of state mission heads’ only (chief ambassadors of countries) and
>> >    allowing other persons and/or United Nations employees to view
>> >    them was a punishable offense. Uncertain what to do, and with the
>> >    meeting beginning, I merely sat there stunned. My seat and the one
>> >    the African gentleman next to me took seemed extras because they
>> >    neglected having any indication regarding country origin in front
>> >    of them on the table; I felt safe.
>> >
>> >    As totally immersed and interesting as I found the topics, the
>> >    African ambassador seated found boring. I say this owing to
>> >    noticing during the entire meeting he was merely doodling
>> >    nonsensical pictures on some legal pad. I think that no one took
>> >    more notes that day than me. I was especially interested in the
>> >    interstate bickering about financing the international criminal
>> >    court should and when it came about. Spain was particularly
>> >    forceful in vocalizing its opinion that the countries giving the
>> >    most monetary contributions to the court itself ought have more
>> >    power over both its staffing and its innocent and guilty verdicts
>> >    as well as judges appointed. My suspicions’ equally shared by
>> >    scholars such as Noam Chomsky and former attorney general, Ramsey
>> >    Clark were now fully justifiably confirmed. The court itself was a
>> >    great travesty of justice and I was actually witnessing quarrels
>> >    between countries insofar as controlling the courts judges and
>> >    verdicts based on financial contributions rather than on law and
>> >    true international justice.
>> >
>> >    The most shocking point of the meeting for me was when the Israeli
>> >    ambassador admitted openly to the other attendees that Israel was
>> >    indifferent to war crimes, crimes against humanity and would in no
>> >    manner support any international structure limiting its’ ability
>> >    for practicing war and peace against any other state and/or party
>> >    it considered a threat to its national interest.
>> >
>> >    The ambassador representing the United States that day strongly
>> >    and equally explicitly backed the Israeli position making clear
>> >    American attendance was more for information gathering purposes
>> >    and show than true concern for international law, world peace and
>> >    social justice. When the meeting ended I slipped quickly out the
>> >    front entrance of the United Nations; notes and papers in hand; I
>> >    would read them in detail later that evening. When I attended
>> >    these Preparatory Meetings at the end, the First Ambassador to the
>> >    Bosnian Mission in NYC (The Serbian Doctor with glasses) came in
>> >    but only stayed a short while as my witness to my being there.
>> >
>> >
>> >    It must have amazed Darko upon returning from Serbia I actually
>> >    gained entrance to the ICC preparatory closed meeting because
>> >    within a week he invited me to the city to attend another
>> >    important meeting at the United Nations comprised of diplomats
>> >    from some very selective and prestigious NATO member states. I
>> >    don’t recall the date but by his return fully I understood the
>> >    definition of a closed meeting. Upon approaching the meeting door
>> >    I became at once cognizant the meeting stated “closed meeting,” on
>> >    the door. I did my best to point this fact out to Darko who told
>> >    me to go in with him anyway; we did. Darko obviously thought
>> >    because I gained entrance to the ICC meeting I ought not have in
>> >    his absence, perhaps if I were with him, he covertly could gain
>> >    access this closed NATO meeting; no dice. Upon entering the room,
>> >    immediately some important looking man called him over and
>> >    diplomatically informed him that “Serbia was not invited.” Darko
>> >    pointed to me explaining that he was with the American lady but he
>> >    was asked politely to leave; I followed him out the door
>> >    embarrassed.
>> >
>> >    The following year was mundane. Filled with activities like
>> >    shuttling back and forth to FDU for graduate school, fund raising
>> >    for the Law Projects Center and co-authoring two book with Darko.
>> >    The fateful day of 9/11 and the attacks by Al-Qaeda on the World
>> >    Trade Center Towers in New York City changed my venue forever.
>> >    Post 9/11 Darko became a man on a personal mission seemingly
>> >    unrelated to the Bosnian mission itself.
>> >
>> >    He told me it was the utmost importance to publicize the alleged
>> >    fact that the head ambassador of the Bosnian mission was in his
>> >    estimation involved with Al-Qaeda.
>> >
>> >    Darko had a seemingly ton of secret documentary evidence emanating
>> >    from the ministry of internal affairs in Belgrade and Bosnia
>> >    seeming true bolstering his allegations in my eyes then.
>> >
>> >    Asking me to fervently work on editing a book on which topic was
>> >    meant for exposing the head ambassador of the Bosnian mission at
>> >    that time; I acceded. The publication was later published by the
>> >    Repubika Srpska information agency in Bosnia. The Serbian
>> >    government in the Republika Srpska in Bosnia then was seriously
>> >    pressing Darko for a fast publication so we stayed up many nights
>> >    over his apartment in Forest Hills, New York working to do so. The
>> >    book was entitled, ”The Bosnia Model of Al-Qaeda Terrorism. It can
>> >    probably still be found and read online. Last time I checked it
>> >    was posted on the website:
>> >    http://www.analyst-network.com/profile.php?user_id=240.
>> >
>> >    Darko always told me I possessed full rights to this and other
>> >    publications we worked on together. Although I edited and
>> >    co-authoring the Al-Qaeda work, a few years back I noticed Darko
>> >    removed my name on the inner front cover page as editor replacing
>> >    it with the name of a Serbian editor. When questioned about it
>> >    Darko told me he kept my name from being published because of the
>> >    death threats and dangers to my life that he himself encountered
>> >    because of its publication. I do vividly remember Darko receiving
>> >    a great many death threats and threats towards his wife at the
>> >    time, Bojana.
>> >
>> >    Jill Starr - Oct 17, 2010 7:03 PM - Remove
>> >
>> >    On an end note, also attending the ICC meeting that day along with
>> >    me (although my memory is vague), was US Diplomat Richard
>> >    Holbrook.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >    I DO vaguely remember his thick dark brown eye glasses and face
>> >    filled up with potholes from pimples. As the Spain representative
>> >    was discussing the proposition of bribery for financial funding of
>> >    the ICC, Holbrook merely nodded his head (and he had a paper
>> >    tablet and pen in his hand as well) ... HOLBROOK NEVER ONCE SAID
>> >    EVEN ONE WORD TO SPAIN CENSORING THEM FOR BRINGING UP THE TOPIC OF
>> >    JUDICIAL BRIBERY WHICH WAS ILLEGAL BY ALL LEGAL STANDARDS!
>> >
>> >    JIll Starr
>> >
>> >    LPC NYC USA
>> >
>> >        Top of Form
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >    Add comment
>> >
>> >        Bottom of Form
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >    _______________________________________________
>> >    Discuss mailing list
>> >    [email protected]
>> >    http://lists.freeculture.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>> >    FAQ: http://wiki.freeculture.org/Fc-discuss
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >_______________________________________________
>> >Discuss mailing list
>> >[email protected]
>> >http://lists.freeculture.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>> >FAQ: http://wiki.freeculture.org/Fc-discuss
>> _______________________________________________
>> Discuss mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.freeculture.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>> FAQ: http://wiki.freeculture.org/Fc-discuss
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Alec Story
> Cornell University
> Biological Sciences, Computer Science 2012
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.freeculture.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> FAQ: http://wiki.freeculture.org/Fc-discuss
>
>
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freeculture.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
FAQ: http://wiki.freeculture.org/Fc-discuss

Reply via email to