Also found this site:
you've been
          owned
http://www.youvebeenowned.org/

It is an extremely serious case because they are attacking property rights.
Anyone who is attacking property rights is a thief. It doesn't matter what pretext you use to coat your action. Property rights is absolute morality.


On 30/10/2012 9:39 AM, Boris Mindzak wrote:
I'm surprised that there doesn't seem to be more chatter about this case here. It would basically throw first sale doctrine into chaos.

http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2012/10/supreme-court-seeks-a-way-around-perpetual-copyright-on-foreign-goods/?comments=1#comments-bar
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2012/10/a-supreme-court-clash-could-change-what-ownership-means/


_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freeculture.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
FAQ: http://wiki.freeculture.org/Fc-discuss


_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freeculture.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
FAQ: http://wiki.freeculture.org/Fc-discuss

Reply via email to