> This is a very cool exercise, other than the licensing which you require.
The licensing, correct, I won't bend on, though your sentiment confuses me. jQuery is being considered by John under a dual GPL/MIT license so that it can get into Drupal and, since all my development work is centered around Drupal, I'd want something similar for my own needs. Likewise, the needs and desire for this framework to be open-sourced goes back to something I wrote six years ago: http://www.gamegrene.com/node/12 If you're against the GPL specifically, fine; if you're against all-OSI licenses in general (of which the MIT license is), then I don't "get it" - you'd be getting paid either way, and you'd lose ownership of the code (the "work for hire") in the first place - you wouldn't get a choice in the decision either way. Would it have made a difference if I just said "this is a work for hire, I own the code" and then have released it under the GPL /without/ having told everyone, and been open about it? I don't want to drive this thread down the path of licensing, but am I missing something? -- Morbus Iff ( in japan, i'm known as a puchi-iede. ) Technical: http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/au/779 Culture: http://www.disobey.com/ and http://www.gamegrene.com/ icq: 2927491 / aim: akaMorbus / yahoo: morbus_iff / jabber.org: morbus _______________________________________________ jQuery mailing list [email protected] http://jquery.com/discuss/
