Stefan Petre wrote: > The caching idea is very good. For sure I will implement such a thing. > Cool. > The demo is on demos page. > Ok, but the link is broken. > The fx part I will keep it like it is now because it is easier to > implement then to explain to starters how they can bind there own > function. Maybe I will extend this part to accept a function as > parameter too. > My idea was this: It is easier to use a function that is documented somewhere else in detail, instead of figuring out how to use the custom object. But you make a good point, understanding callback functions may not be so very easy. Would be nice to here other opinions about this. > The forum is off because soon jQuery will have a forum and John told me > that interface will have a category there. Besides, I don't have time > for support and people are expecting at least an answer. Even I don't > respond quick to bug reports and so I always consider what everyone says. > That is an interessting information. You write that on your page instead of presenting a broken link. > The problem with draggables on example pages is that the mousemove event > is binded to the body and the height of the body is not the same as > window's height. So when you leave the body with the dragged element the > event is not triggered anymore. I know about the flickering (some fx > plugins and sortables example when the page has scroll and is scrolled > at least some pixels) and I'm working on this to solve it. > Ah, good to know you are working on it. You know, it looks like your plugin collection is the most famous one in the jQuery sphere, thats why some information would help quite a lot of people.
-- Jörn _______________________________________________ jQuery mailing list [email protected] http://jquery.com/discuss/
