On Tuesday 05 September 2006 22:04, Justin Carter wrote: > On 9/6/06, Rey Bango <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Figured you all might take a gander at this and weigh in: > > > > http://blogs.zdnet.com/Stewart/?p=101 > > > > He and I have been having our own little "discussion". :P > > > > Rey... > > Ugh, I stopped reading half way and just skimmed the rest :P > > Flash 9 and Flex 2 are awesome, but its horses for courses. Flex 2 is > for full on applications. JavaScript CAN achieve some of the same > things in web applications, but it's power is that it works well with > HTML and CSS in enhancing a web site, whereas Flex can do no such > thing without making the site less accessible (IMO, though I think > most would agree).
When I can write Flash in the open source text editor of my choice and have it play in full glory in an open source web browser on an open source OS with an open source flash player that isn't 3 versions behind, then I'll care about Flash. Until then, it's dead to me. -- Larry Garfield AIM: LOLG42 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ: 6817012 "If nature has made any one thing less susceptible than all others of exclusive property, it is the action of the thinking power called an idea, which an individual may exclusively possess as long as he keeps it to himself; but the moment it is divulged, it forces itself into the possession of every one, and the receiver cannot dispossess himself of it." -- Thomas Jefferson _______________________________________________ jQuery mailing list [email protected] http://jquery.com/discuss/
