On 9/9/06, John Resig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I've made one project in code.google, and the url is: > > > > http://code.google.com/p/jbasicext/ > > > > this is only some basic extensions about string and array, if you are > > interesting in it, you can checkout and try it. But there is not > > document jet, and there are no complex functions. > > Great start. I'm kind of confused as to why you use the $.c namespace. > It seems like that this is one instance where it would be a good idea > to use the 'Object' namespace, or similar. I guess it depends if you > were developing this to become an add-on for jQuery, specifically, or > just a generic add-on. > Because I saw that Dave Methvin don't like extending Object class, so I don't know where can I put these common functions. And I'm a newbie to jQuery, so many things I don't know very clearly now. And these things all can be changed, if you like it. Some funcations is only based my experience and my interesting, so maybe they are not sufficient or useful.
-- I like python! My Blog: http://www.donews.net/limodou UliPad Site: http://wiki.woodpecker.org.cn/moin/UliPad UliPad Maillist: http://groups.google.com/group/ulipad _______________________________________________ jQuery mailing list [email protected] http://jquery.com/discuss/
