There's also good things here: http://www.jsfromhell.com and there:
http://dev.rubyonrails.org/browser/spinoffs/prototype/src

Franck.

2006/9/9, limodou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 9/9/06, Jörn Zaefferer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > just uploaded a set of extensions to the String object. Until now, there
> > is no way yet to generate documentation like it is done with jQuery,
> > therefore the presentation is not too interessting.
> > You can see the test suite running here:
> > http://joern.jquery.com/sandbox/stringTest.html (together with links for
> > uncompressed and compressed version).
> > All functions have inline documentation with examples.
> >
> > Does this make any sense at all? Would you consider those extensions usful?
> > And, the most interesting question: Would it be a good idea to depend
> > jQuery on this, eg. replacing $.trim and therefore making jQuery itself
> > smaller?
> >
> > -- Jörn
> >
> > P.S.: Coming next, Arrays :-)
> >
> I also made something like your.
>
> http://code.google.com/p/jbasicext/
>
>
> --
> I like python!
> My Blog: http://www.donews.net/limodou
> UliPad Site: http://wiki.woodpecker.org.cn/moin/UliPad
> UliPad Maillist: http://groups.google.com/group/ulipad
>
> _______________________________________________
> jQuery mailing list
> discuss@jquery.com
> http://jquery.com/discuss/
>

_______________________________________________
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/

Reply via email to