Jörn Zaefferer schrieb:
> Hi folks,
>
> after the discussion about the global ajax handlers and the question, if
> the form plugin should be merged into the core, I'd like to know
> wheather anyone has any other issues, problems or ideas for the AJAX
> module that can be addressed. Now is the time!
>
> I'm currently adding lots of tests to make sure that the current code
> works as documented (eg. timeout doesn't seem to work as expected) and
> any refactorings won't break existing code. Planned are primarily
> bugfixes, then the refactoring as proposed by Will
> (http://jquery.com/dev/bugs/bug/159/), then the mentioned above, merging
> form and improving the global handlers, eg. allowing to override them.
Hi Jörn,
John made a ticket for a local timeout option, like:
$.ajax({
...
timeout: 5000,
...
});
To have that would be nice. See here:
http://jquery.com/dev/bugs/bug/195/
I reported a bug that an unset Last-Modified header breaks Firefox. I'm
not sure if my proposed fix is sufficient, but I think it is really
important that this is fixed (If you haven't configured your server to
set such header, Ajax simply does not work in Firefox 1.0).
http://jquery.com/dev/bugs/bug/165/
I also found, that the only way to load an html fragment with having
script blocks evaluated is to use the load() method. Shouldn't that work
with $.ajax and a dataType of "html" as well?. It seems to me, that
people tend to use $.ajax more and more.
Let me know if I can help out.
> One issue that could use some opinions is this:
> http://jquery.com/dev/bugs/bug/196/
> Is there anyone who uses jQuery AND XMLHttpRequest directly?
I think what is meant here, is that other libraries do IE browser
sniffing by checking the XHR object, right?
In my opinion, jQuery shouldn't be responsible for others bad code.
-- Klaus
_______________________________________________
jQuery mailing list
[email protected]
http://jquery.com/discuss/