Fil wrote: > >> Are you saying that there should be a section on jQuery set aside for >> womens >> issues? > > Did I say such a thing? :-D > No. But implication is such a strong thing! ;)
Fil wrote: > > I mentioned Debian-women because they have produced interesting work on > these issues, and invited you to read one of these articles. I don't claim > that jQuery should have a jQuery-women project! > I read it, thankyou! It was interesting to read, and quite enlightening, if a little bit odd. Maybe I have a unique perspective on it! Anyhow, I've probably disrupted this particular thread enough! I've offered my help on future articles, but as for OT comments, I'm done! :) -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Magazine-Typo-corrections-tf2336238.html#a6509808 Sent from the JQuery mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ jQuery mailing list [email protected] http://jquery.com/discuss/
