Brandon Aaron schrieb: > ** Going to re-read to make sure I'm not complete off-base ** > > Okay ... so after re-reading I think that Jörn's first idea is the > better one than the other suggestions. My only concern is that it > changes the behavior of the is method. I still think making this its > own method is the best option. > > With that said I think either modifying the is method, not method or > *preferably* adding a new method with this simple syntax will be very > useful! > The modification to is() won't break any existing code that uses is() as documented (with only one paramter). But before closing this topic: Could you please have a look at the other solution to this: http://jquery.com/discuss/2006-October/012969/ This avoids the anonymous functions, but it's use is limited to jQuery methods.
-- Jörn _______________________________________________ jQuery mailing list [email protected] http://jquery.com/discuss/
