> I'm all for that. I've always thought it awkward of XHTML to have the > value of those attributes be the same as their name. Naturally, you may > want to support the existing syntax as well for backwards compatibility.
.attr() isn't going anywhere, nor is .removeAttr(). I assume that's what you mean by "existing syntax". Yeah, this would just be a simple addition. --John _______________________________________________ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
