Hi Laurent, I was actually replying to Brandon re: his suggestion. I wanted to get a better understanding from him on the change he suggested and how that would impact normal, non-plugin development.
Rey... Laurent Yaish wrote: > What I'm trying to say is that using the $ alias by default is fine. > And just having to change the '$ = jQuery' line to use another alias > is okay with me, except that the $ alias was being used in the jQuery > code itself, so I had to search and replace it everywhere. The jQuery > code (and plugins) should not be using the alias. If you want to use a > shorter alias internally maybe you could use something more unique > like $jq. > > > > On 10/6/06, Rey Bango <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>So you think JQuery should change the $ to another identifier or you >>feel JQuery should implement namespaces? If its the latter, I'm not keen >>on that. I like the shorter code approach the JQuery and Prototype use >>but if there's a way to keep that (eg: JQ()), then I'd go for something >>like that. >> >>Rey... >> >>Brandon Aaron wrote: >> >>>I think it would be worth it to change all internals of jQuery to not >>>use $. Essentially it is just a find and replace ... the issue is >>>getting plugins to do it. I think the next release should force the >>>issue. >> >>_______________________________________________ >>jQuery mailing list >>[email protected] >>http://jquery.com/discuss/ >> > > > _______________________________________________ > jQuery mailing list > [email protected] > http://jquery.com/discuss/ > _______________________________________________ jQuery mailing list [email protected] http://jquery.com/discuss/
