On 11/10/06, John Resig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I don't think this is a big problem, we can just rename the form's > > serialize method to formSerialize or something like that. It's > > unfortunate that two methods of the same name exist and it's better to > > fix it now than to perpetuate it. I think the real question is > > whether or not to add another 2K to core. > > I think form.js's .serialize() should supercede the serialize() in > ajax.js. It's all around a better plugin. If we're serious about > merging jQuery and the form plugin, then the better one should go > first. > > As far as adding weight to core, I don't think we should. Instead, I > think the "download" mechanism should be improved to include the most > popular plugins (like Interface, Forms, and Dimensions). > > If anything, I think the meat of jQuery should be getting smaller. > > --John
Core could be leaner, but what do you take out (perhaps XPath)? Also I have noticed that when you do 'configure your download' you get the old version (pre 1.0), dated May 12th. _______________________________________________ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
