> Okay so ... after looking over the code in the 1.0.2 release (and > possibly earlier versions) work just fine with the plain ol' show and > hide methods. However, the fx's show and hide methods just blow up. I > believe this type of functionality is going to be better suited as a > plugin.
I disagree. While it would be 'painful' - I think adding it in to jQuery would be really good - that's why I added in the original hide/show hack. Rather than having more true features (since those can always be spun off into plugins), jQuery should have the "least amount of surprises". Having code behave as you would expect it to is much more powerful than having to apply hacks to work around problems. Do you agree with me? (IMO, the best solution would be to just make the animations just reference the technology in .show() and .hide(), rather than having to duplicate it all over again) --John _______________________________________________ jQuery mailing list [email protected] http://jquery.com/discuss/
