-- Yehuda
On 10/16/06, Rey Bango <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
For those without a Google login, you can see the results here;
http://www.intoajax.com/pvjcompare.jpg
I also posted this in the Ajaxian entry and Claudio's blog to give
people an alternative view.
Rey...
Rey Bango wrote:
> These numbers have already been invalidated here:
>
> http://0nz.spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?id=o04790098234894520511.5178455417629729589.12842749026303919978.6392792159332293656
>
> One of people that commented on Claudio's posting ran the tests himself
> and got very different results.
>
> Dean Edwards also jumped in to give his viewpoints on this and he said,
>
> "Let me guess. You performed these tests on a page with very few
> elements. Prototype is very good at executing lots of little queries. It
> is very bad at executing lots of large queries. Please post your source
> code."
>
> and
>
> "Try buidling a page with ten thousand nodes then run the tests again…"
>
> So it appears that the benchmarks are very representative of anything
> except perhaps spreading a little FUD.
>
> Rey...
>
> Nilesh Patel wrote:
>
>>hey all, anyone else seen this too?
>>
>>
>>http://ajaxian.com/archives/benchmark-prototype-and-jquery
>>
>>Claudio Cicali thinks benchmarks are boring and useless, so he decided
>>to conduct a series of micro-benchmarks of CSS selector tests with both
>>Prototype and jQuery. He decided to do this after he saw others observe:
>>
>> * Prototype (1.5+) has CSS selector syntax now
>> * "jQuery is horribly SLOW"
>>
>>
>>
>>http://ajaxian.com/archives/benchmark-prototype-and-jquery
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> jQuery mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://jquery.com/discuss/
>
_______________________________________________
jQuery mailing list
[email protected]
http://jquery.com/discuss/
--
Yehuda Katz
Web Developer | Wycats Designs
(ph) 718.877.1325
_______________________________________________ jQuery mailing list [email protected] http://jquery.com/discuss/
