There's also a tradeoff - downloading larger graphic files vs. processing time. In case of clients poor connection it's better to do it programmatically than make them wait for the graphics to download methinks.
-- Tom Sieron. On 10/16/06, Rey Bango <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Rick Faircloth wrote: > > The best question for me would be: > > > > "How much does it cost to do it programmatically?" > > > > How long for the download time of any needed > > script...how long for the processing to occur... > > > > if it's minimal, then I would much rather do it on-the-fly > > than take time to process each photo or graphic manually in Photoshop... > > > > Rick > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > > Behalf Of Andy Matthews > > Sent: Monday, October 16, 2006 9:12 AM > > To: jQuery Discussion. > > Subject: Re: [jQuery] [ANN] JReflection > > > > I wonder... > > > > Is this REALLY something that needs a plugin? It's obviously done already, > > but just do it in Photoshop or the Gimp or something. You're already loading > > the image, why waste browser processing time/speed with something that could > > be static. > > > > My opinion is that if it doesn't increase functionality or do something for > > you that would take forever manually, why bother with a plugin? > > _______________________________________________ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
