the only other idea I had was <script type="text/x-accordion-parameters">
but that was too long, On 10/31/06, Ⓙⓐⓚⓔ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > is it as bad as using li & ul to create menus or using classes for > non-css purposes? > > my $.0000002 cents! > > > On 10/30/06, Klaus Hartl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Ⓙⓐⓚⓔ schrieb: > > > if you really have to validate, and don't want each spec stuffed into > > > the javascript (script tag or onclick), consider putting the spec > > > inside a <code class="accordion_snippet"> tag (which would be hidden > > > in css) > > > and could be extracted as easily as the title attribute! > > > or a special dtd defined attribute. > > > > > > and it is code, so I see no problem with it! Anybody see any problem with > > > that?? > > > > This is a misuse of the code element of course. See, the code element > > designates a fragment of computer code to be *rendered*, not to be > > executed by the user agent. That's like putting all your jQuery code > > into a code element and eval it. > > > > This is not unobtrusive either. > > > > > > Just my $.002 > > > > > > -- Klaus > > > > _______________________________________________ > > jQuery mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://jquery.com/discuss/ > > > > > -- > Ⓙⓐⓚⓔ - יעקב ʝǡǩȩ ᎫᎪᏦᎬ > -- Ⓙⓐⓚⓔ - יעקב ʝǡǩȩ ᎫᎪᏦᎬ _______________________________________________ jQuery mailing list [email protected] http://jquery.com/discuss/
