Dave,

It just dawned on me I could pull the js from you site:

http://imaptools.com:8081/test/jquery-xml-bug2.html?413
http://imaptools.com:8081/test/jquery-xml-bug2.html?501

And both of these fail in IE6.

-Steve

Stephen Woodbridge wrote:
> Dave,
> 
> Thank you for looking into this.
> 
> I just set up a test case that fails roughly using your test case as a 
> model. I tested it based on todays svn and it fails in IE6. Can you test 
> it against the older versions.
> 
> http://imaptools.com:8081/test/jquery-xml-bug.html
> http://imaptools.com:8081/test/jquery-xml-bug.xml
> 
> -Steve
> 
> Dave Methvin wrote:
>> I just set up a test case based closely on the sample code at the top of bug
>> #164 and can't get it to fail in IE6 with build 501:
>>
>> http://methvin.com/junk/jquery-xml-bug.html?501
>>
>> It does not fail on 413 either, using the copy of the file from
>> http://imaptools.com:8081/js/jquery.js :
>>
>> http://methvin.com/junk/jquery-xml-bug.html?413
>>
>> Can someone still experiencing this problem in real code please respond with
>> a working (uh, non-working) test case and information about the version of
>> the browser? Is it possible that the dependent variable is the version of
>> MSXML instead of the browser?
>>
>> For these situations, it would be very handy if we kept an archive of older
>> builds, and if the files had the revision number inside the .jquery
>> variable. You can't easily get the built files out of SVN.
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> jQuery mailing list
>> discuss@jquery.com
>> http://jquery.com/discuss/
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> jQuery mailing list
> discuss@jquery.com
> http://jquery.com/discuss/


_______________________________________________
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/

Reply via email to