This actually doesn't fix the issue and doesn't seem like it is
fixable since IE makes no distinction between the form node and the
form.elements collection. The workaround is to do it like this:

$($.merge(form.elements, []));

--
Brandon Aaron



On 11/6/06, Brandon Aaron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Okay ... looking through all the properties of the form.elements
> nodelist in IE reveals that it is exactly the form element as you
> said. That also means it has a reference to the elements property. So
> to fix this 'special case' I added this:
>
> this.get( a.constructor == Array || a.length != undefined && (
> !a.nodeType || (jQuery.browser.msie && a.elements) ) && a[0] !=
> undefined && a[0].nodeType ?
>
> This appears to work fine but I don't know if it will affect anything else.
> http://brandon.jquery.com/testing/node_lists/
>
> If it doesn't break anything else, then we should probably get this
> and the fix for #164 in SVN and get another point release out the
> door.
>
> --
> Brandon Aaron
>
> On 11/6/06, Dave Methvin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Do you know what the nodeType test is for on that line?
> >
> > That nodeType test is trying to tell the difference between a NodeList and a
> > DOMElement. If it's a DOMElement it will have a non-zero nodeType.
> >
> > > What would break if we took it out?
> >
> > If you took it out, any DOMElement with a .length property would be treated
> > like a list and not an element. For example, the form element has a length.
> > If you passed in $(document.myform) and myform had 3 elements, jQuery.length
> > would be 3 instead of 1.
> >
> > The intent was to allow collections like form.elements to pass in lists of
> > nodes but still let you pass in the form element if you wanted to refer to
> > just the form element. IE is spoiling that.
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > jQuery mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://jquery.com/discuss/
> >
>

_______________________________________________
jQuery mailing list
[email protected]
http://jquery.com/discuss/

Reply via email to