ok little may be a bit strong... but I'd only used sync for little applications where it was ok to keep the user waiting.
On 11/7/06, Laurent Yaish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Using sync requests has nothing to do with "little" applications. It is > actually useful sometimes to prevent > the user from doing anything else until your call has returned. > > Laurent > > > On 11/7/06, Ⓙⓐⓚⓔ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Sync is only cool for little XMLHttpRequest applications... they wait > > until the asynch request is done. > > > > jq handles all the async stuff for us. You just code $.ajax with a > > callback, and you have all the ease of the sync request without the > > actual waiting. > > > > On 11/7/06, Sébastien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > I would find very useful to have a synchronous XMLHttpRequest option in > > > jQuery, at least for the "$.ajax" operation. > > > > > > What would be the best way to add synchronous XMLHttpRequest within > > > jQuery ? > > > > > > -- Sébastien > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > jQuery mailing list > > > [email protected] > > > http://jquery.com/discuss/ > > > > > > > > > -- > > Ⓙⓐⓚⓔ - יעקב ʝǡǩȩ ᎫᎪᏦᎬ > > _______________________________________________ > > jQuery mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://jquery.com/discuss/ > > > > > _______________________________________________ > jQuery mailing list > [email protected] > http://jquery.com/discuss/ > > > -- Ⓙⓐⓚⓔ - יעקב ʝǡǩȩ ᎫᎪᏦᎬ _______________________________________________ jQuery mailing list [email protected] http://jquery.com/discuss/
