> I was just thinking the same thing. > Would this be possible? > > The file names would need to be consistent so that a plug in could require > jquery+ajax+forms.js or something like that. Version numbers could get > tricky.
Another point: It would be nice to see from the filename if the content is already compressed or not. I thought about creating a new file extension for compressed files, eg. ".jsc" (java script compressed). It wouldn't matter if editors aren't linked to that extension, the source isn't readable anyway. But I wonder if webservers set the right content type when sending that file, and if that can cause any trouble. -- Jörn Zaefferer http://bassistance.de -- Der GMX SmartSurfer hilft bis zu 70% Ihrer Onlinekosten zu sparen! Ideal für Modem und ISDN: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/smartsurfer _______________________________________________ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
