Brandon Aaron wrote: > So in my little bit of testing IE7 shows that the filter is applied > because the text has the smoothing removed. Also, it only works for me > (IE6 and 7) by removing position: relative; and it doesn't matter if > it has a width or not. Position absolute made it fail also. > > I ran into some weird CSS issues just yesterday with position relative > in IE. I'll go through some more testing ... >
Thanks for taking a look :) Are you sure it doesn't matter if you have width or not? The following both work OK for me (IE 6, WinXP): http://kelvinluck.com/assets/jquery/fadeBug/index3.html (position, no width) http://kelvinluck.com/assets/jquery/fadeBug/index4.html (width but no position) It is only this one that fails: http://kelvinluck.com/assets/jquery/fadeBug/index2.html (position and width). I guess the question is - is it a problem with IEs internal rendering of the opacity or is the problem in how jQuery is setting the opacity? Cheers, Kelvin :) _______________________________________________ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
