Hi,
> This is a necessary limitation. May I ask you to explain why is this necessary. (We user earlier prototype and scriptaculos did not use this approach.) (Sorry for mentioning prototype on this mail list, I'm just curious about this topic.) > A possible workaround is to put the > inline element inside a block element, and animate the wrapper instead > of the element itself. It depends heavily on your usecase if this would > work, but it's worth a try. Yes, we used this approach. Best Regards, Felhő _______________________________________________ jQuery mailing list [email protected] http://jquery.com/discuss/
