Very interesting discussion / development that is going on there, thanks
for this little update ray.
Now one thing that just confused the heck out of me was that when I hit
page info on his page (and his test suite) , my FF said is was rendered
in *quirks mode*! Up until now I've been pretty amazed with the stuff
he's done (even so it's not jQuery), but I didn't know that he'd even
handicap himself for a bigger challenge ... ; ). Anyway, can somebody
please confirm that it's not just me (early in the morning) and this is
really the case with his page
<http://www.jackslocum.com/blog/index.php>? In that case I could drop
him a little mail so he can fix it.
Now I really don't know, but does the rendering mode also effect DOM
scripting? In that case his tests could be inaccurate beyond the things
mentioned by John in the blog post.
-- Felix
--------------------------
http://www.thinkingphp.org
http://www.fg-webdesign.de
Rey Bango wrote:
Hi everyone. Jack Slocum, the maker of the YUI-Ext lib, recently posted
some performance benchmarks that compared his new extension, DOMQuery,
to several libraries. jQuery was included in the comparison and in his
tests, jQuery incorrectly appeared to fail or run slower than DomQuery.
So we saw this an opportunity to present our own test results.
Here is John's posting on the jQuery blog re: this issue:
http://jquery.com/blog/2007/01/11/selector-speeds/
He has also replied to Jack on his blog. If you choose to reply to
Jack's posting, lets ensure that we remain professional at all times.
DomQuery is actually incredibly fast but we feel that the results
weren't consistent with what we've seen and that we have a performance
edge at this moment.
Rey
_______________________________________________
jQuery mailing list
[email protected]
http://jquery.com/discuss/
_______________________________________________
jQuery mailing list
[email protected]
http://jquery.com/discuss/
