The jQuery site validates for me
http://validator.w3.org/check?verbose=1&uri=http%3A%2F%2Fjquery.com%2F
As for the plugins page, maybe the Wiki that powers it doesn't
generate valid markup.
For the CSS, maybe it could be changed to overflow: hidden (I have
never heard of overflow: none before).
The problem with CSS validation is it can be hard to get right
visually and be valid. Browsers have their own quirks, so hacks may
often be used (in the case of IE conditional comments are a good
solution, so the hacks can go in their own stylesheet without the
validator picking them up).
Also I don't think CSS validation is as important (due to the wide
variety of support amongst different user agents) and editing your CSS
to remove all the warning can really bloat the code
('background-color: inherit' on everything that has a color and
vice-versa). Not many developers will parse CSS (leave that to the
browser vendors), but they may parse HTML.
On 23/01/07, Roger Ineichen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all
>
> The jquery.com website doesn't follow the standards.
> The plugin page http://docs.jquery.com/Plugins
> has over 130 HTML validation errors.
>
> Also the CSS is not valid.
> http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator?profile=css2&warning=2&uri=http
> ://docs.jquery.com/Plugins
>
> Can somebody take a look at that?
>
> Regards
> Roger Ineichen
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> jQuery mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://jquery.com/discuss/
>
_______________________________________________
jQuery mailing list
[email protected]
http://jquery.com/discuss/
