there are a million reasons to separate js from the html!
but UOJS is the ability for a page to still work without javascript. A
very admirable feature!
On 1/24/07, Klaus Hartl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ⓙⓐⓚⓔ wrote:
> > I'm with you! If you know your audience you don't need to do
> > unobtrusive JavaScript.
> >
> > But generally it's much cooler to make sites that work for alternate
> > devices! sight impaired and physically challenged folks need
> > information too! Not to mention the fools who have javascript turned
> > off!
>
> There's another great side effect of UOJS, even if you don't have to
> care to be accessible: much improved maintainability. In the old days
> you polluted your HTML with all the inline event handler attributes
> (much like font tags and that sort of thing). If you had to change
> things you had to go and change it in 12399 templates and had at least
> forgotten one.
>
> Now with a clean separation of structure and behavior which is one goal
> of UOJS you simply have to change what is due to change in one line of JS:
>
> $('a').click(function() {
> // change here once
> });
>
> As much as we try to separate presentation and structure (via CSS) the
> same applies to behavior and structure (and of course behavior and
> presentation).
>
>
> -- Klaus
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> jQuery mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://jquery.com/discuss/
>
--
Ⓙⓐⓚⓔ - יעקב ʝǡǩȩ ᎫᎪᏦᎬ
_______________________________________________
jQuery mailing list
[email protected]
http://jquery.com/discuss/
