Ah yes.... then the array is not an array... I think we all agree that
it's a terrible practice!
I guess when dealing with mixed libraries written in mixed styles, one
can still get burned!
On 1/30/07, Blair Mitchelmore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Unless someone has custom code that extends the Array objects prototype
> property. Then those functions will become a part of the iteration.
>
> -blair
>
> Ⓙⓐⓚⓔ wrote:
> > it's safe when you know what's in the array, and you are sure it's not
> > an array-like object
> >
> > On 1/30/07, Michael Geary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> $.fn.border = function(prefix){
> >>> var classNames = [ 'north', 'east', 'south', 'west', 'northeast',
> >> 'southeast', 'southwest', 'northwest'];
> >>> return this.each(function(){
> >>> for (var index in classNames){
> >>> className = (prefix || '')+ classNames[index];
> >>> $(this).wrap("<div class='" + className + " block'></div>")
> >>> }
> >>> })
> >>> };
> >> Danger warning! Don't use for..in on an array! Use a C-style loop instead.
> >>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> jQuery mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://jquery.com/discuss/
>
--
Ⓙⓐⓚⓔ - יעקב ʝǡǩȩ ᎫᎪᏦᎬ
_______________________________________________
jQuery mailing list
[email protected]
http://jquery.com/discuss/
