> file where one of the elements attributes is "for," which in my case will
> help the end user know what the 'txt' attr is for in the design/flow of the
> site and the naming convention was totally arbitrary. So, in my instance,
> when I call .attr('for') i get 'undefined', but if I change the attribute to
> 'whatfor' in the xml file and then call with .attr('whatfor'); it spits back
> the value of the attribute. Other then for a label tag, I am not sure where
> else the 'for' attribute is used for. I can toss up a test page if needed.
There's a few attr names you'll want to stay away from for xml docs:
for, class, float, opacity. jQuery has special handling for these to
fix common mistakes and browser inconsistencies.
_______________________________________________
jQuery mailing list
[email protected]
http://jquery.com/discuss/
