Hi, It seems that each developer can prove his results are the best. I've just compared the following sites:
http://john.jquery.com/speed/ http://john.jquery.com/speed/ (comparing jQold and jQuery as delivered by JResig - obviously new jQuery won, second column) http://john.jquery.com/speed/yui.html http://john.jquery.com/speed/yui.html (comparing jQuery and DomQuery as delivered by JResig - obviously jQuery won, first column) http://www.yui-ext.com/playpen/selectors/jquery/ http://www.yui-ext.com/playpen/selectors/jquery/ (comparing jQuery, DomQuery and Dojo as delivered by JSlocum - obviously DomQuery won, second column) http://dojotoolkit.org/~alex/query/bench/query_lib/jquery_test_page.html http://dojotoolkit.org/~alex/query/bench/query_lib/jquery_test_page.html (comparing jQuery, DomQuery and Dojo as delivered by ARussel - obviously Dojo won, third column) Remarks: 1. It seems that JSlocum and ARussel uses somehow outdated version of jQuery for comparison (is it unfair?) 2. It seems that JResig has improved his timings in the meantime (is it surprise?) 3. From unknown reasons, ARussel has redefined meaning and succession of some tests (is it intentional?) 4. It seems that actual JResig results are in most cases best of all. 5. I've performed all tests on Windows XP with IE6. Here is small screen dump, in succession mentioned above: http://www.nabble.com/file/6256/DOMtests2.jpg It would be better to have single common page for tests, referring to newests library releases... -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Is-jQuery-that-dawn-slow--tf3174039.html#a8807996 Sent from the JQuery mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
