Hi Andy... are you referring to the one that returns a wddx packet from the cfc using the $.get() directly? As for AjaxCFC, I think I just like the thought of having the extra layer of Error Trapping and Security Check features for CFCs that Rob put in place. What's your thoughts? Thanks, Andy.
> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Andy Matthews > Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 11:44 AM > To: 'jQuery Discussion.' > Subject: Re: [jQuery] AjaxCFC (paging Rey Bango...) > > Michael... > > Have you seen how easy it is to access a CFC directly using jQuery? Dirt > simple. > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Michael E. Carluen > Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 1:18 PM > To: 'jQuery Discussion.' > Subject: Re: [jQuery] AjaxCFC (paging Rey Bango...) > > Paul, on simple data retrieval, I find pure jQuery's $.ajax(), $.post(), > and > $.get() more than sufficient especially when used with .cfm files. > AjaxCFC's however would be my preference when I need to invoke my cfc's... > of course when its out of alpha. As Rey said, it's a case-by-case. My > .02 > Paul. > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > On Behalf Of Paul > > Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 11:12 AM > > To: 'jQuery Discussion.' > > Subject: Re: [jQuery] AjaxCFC (paging Rey Bango...) > > > > That's exactly what I'm looking for, Rey. I've already got my feet > > wet with jQuery's UI tools, so it sounds like AjaxCFC may be a great > > way to handle the Ajax stuff. > > > > Thanks for the insight. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > On Behalf Of Rey Bango > > Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 11:57 AM > > To: jQuery Discussion. > > Subject: Re: [jQuery] AjaxCFC (paging Rey Bango...) > > > > Hi Paul, > > > > I'm so used to doing things sans AjaxCFC for jQuery that I would > > probably stick with straight jQuery since its what I'm most accustomed > > to and I love having greater control over how things are handled. > > > > But I'm very torn because Rob's done a GREAT job of abstracting jQuery > > via AjaxCFC and the functionality he's included such as serialization > > (js, json & wddx), logging, and CF-based error reporting really > > attractive. > > > > So I'd really have to evaluate things on a case by case basis. I don't > > think you can go wrong by using AjaxCFC, especially in the beginning > > where it may make using jQuery much easier for Ajax call manipulation. > > Remember that AjaxCFC isn't there to help you with UI controls or DOM > > manipulation. Its biggest feature is the ability to access CF data > > types easily and work with them during an XMLHttpRequest. You're still > > going to have to dig into the jQuery API in order to handle non-Ajax > > functionality. > > > > Rey... > > > > > > > > Paul wrote: > > > Thanks Rey, I found the jQuery example code in the SVN branch. > > > > > > I know you've been pretty excited about jQuery for a while now--your > > mention > > > of it on the HOF CF list is why I picked it up. Since the AjaxCFC > > change > > is > > > still in Alpha you obviously haven't been using it up to this point > > > but > > I > > > wonder if you were to start a new project now, would you adopt > > > AjaxCFC > > or > > > just do things the way you have been? I need to start on the > > > server- > > side > > > implementation of a project and want to make an informed decision if > > > I can... > > > > > > Thanks again. > > > > > > Paul > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > On Behalf Of Rey Bango > > > Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 10:31 AM > > > To: jQuery Discussion. > > > Subject: Re: [jQuery] AjaxCFC (paging Rey Bango...) > > > > > > Hey Paul, > > > > > > I talked to Rob Gonda about the demos and they should be updated to > > > jQuery v1.1.1. As Chris mentioned, when you download it from > > > RIAForge, it should have updated demos. Are they missing? > > > > > > Rey.... > > > > > > Paul wrote: > > >> About 2 weeks Rey Bango posted that AjaxCFC had been updated to > > >> implement jQuery 1.1, but apparently the ajaxCFC demos have not yet > > been > > >> updated to reflect the change. Since I'm too inexperienced to > > >> fumble > > my > > >> way through it properly, can anybody point me to some basic > > >> getting-started information regarding ajaxCFC and jQuery together? > > >> > > >> > > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >> ---- > > - > > >> > > >> _______________________________________________ > > >> jQuery mailing list > > >> discuss@jquery.com > > >> http://jquery.com/discuss/ > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > jQuery mailing list > > > discuss@jquery.com > > > http://jquery.com/discuss/ > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > jQuery mailing list > > > discuss@jquery.com > > > http://jquery.com/discuss/ > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > jQuery mailing list > > discuss@jquery.com > > http://jquery.com/discuss/ > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > jQuery mailing list > > discuss@jquery.com > > http://jquery.com/discuss/ > > > _______________________________________________ > jQuery mailing list > discuss@jquery.com > http://jquery.com/discuss/ > > > _______________________________________________ > jQuery mailing list > discuss@jquery.com > http://jquery.com/discuss/ _______________________________________________ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
