Kevin, the 3-4 scripts are heavily commented, and it would be very easy to combine them all into one js file and compress it ;)
Kevin Fricovsky wrote: > > > You're library though seems to be very robust, I'm just concerned with the > 3 (or is it 4) js scripts required for it to work. > > I too am a fan of Particle Tree's unobtrusive style of form validation: > http://particletree.com/features/a-guide-to-unobtrusive-javascript-validation/ > > I'm working on a project right now that may allow for me to work on a > solution similar to the ones below using Jquery. > > Yup, know this is the Jquery mailing list but I really like the examples > I've seen using prototype or mootools. > > Here's a good example of the moo and proto examples: > > http://clientside.cnet.com/code-snippets/really-easy-field-validation-with-mootools/ > > Here's the js - > http://clientside.cnet.com/scripts/validator/mooValidation.js > > http://clientside.cnet.com/3rd-party-libraries/really-easy-field-validation-with-prototype/ > > You're right, there's no reason why jquery can't have a similar tool set. > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Jörn Zaefferer > Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 4:59 PM > To: jQuery Discussion. > Subject: [jQuery] jQuery Validation 1.0 Alpha > > Hi folks, > > there were some questions about my very first version of the validation > plugin (it's still on the plugin page). If you are interested in form > validation, you may want to take a look at the current state of the > plugin: http://bassistance.de/jquery-plugins/jquery-plugin-validation/ > > It's 1.0 version is now in alpha status: That means that I can't > guarantee to not change the API until the beta release. But apart from > that, the plugin is already pretty stable, and should provide nearly > everything you need for client-side form validation. > > It uses the metadata plugin, therefore you can choose between > specifiying your validition in the markup via extra class infos or > custom attributes. Or, in case you don't want to use inline markup, you > can just pass the rules as a JavaScript object to the plugin (see the > examples). > > The plugin is aimed at both fast prototyping and highly customized > validation: There are default messages for all provided methods > (required, email etc.) that can be overriden by using the title > attribute on input elements, specifying custom error messages in the > markup (the old method with labels) or via a JavaScript object passed to > the plugin. > > The plugin page contains some more information about known issues, > migration from the old plugin and, in the extreme contrast to the old > version, a nearly complete documentation. I'm sure there is room for > imrovement, but at least it covers everything. > > Demos ( http://jquery.bassistance.de/validation/validateTest.html ) > cover also integration with the form plugin: > http://jquery.bassistance.de/validation/formPluginIntegration.html > > Your feedback is highly appreciated! We should be able to create the > definite solution for jQuery form validation... > > Regards > > -- > Jörn Zaefferer > > http://bassistance.de > > > _______________________________________________ > jQuery mailing list > discuss@jquery.com > http://jquery.com/discuss/ > > _______________________________________________ > jQuery mailing list > discuss@jquery.com > http://jquery.com/discuss/ > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/jQuery-Validation-1.0-Alpha-tf3196319.html#a8888112 Sent from the JQuery mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
