Well, there are fundamental tradeoffs that need to be made. If you want a very small codebase, it's difficult to squeeze in all the speed optimizations. And if you value speed above all else, you might produce a fairly large, blazing library. We're looking at these issues to try and come to a conclusion that will benefit the jQuery community.
-- Yehuda On 2/20/07, Brian Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ideally, there should eventually be one selector base that uses the best methods of both jQuery's selector engine and DomQuery. That way, there's no longer an issue of which one is used. - Brian > Hi Rajesh, > > We're investigating the possibility of supporting the use of DomQuery, > Ext's selector engine, as an alternative (not a replacement) to jQuery's > CSS Selector code. > > Rey... > > R. Rajesh Jeba Anbiah wrote: >> On Feb 20, 5:30 am, Rey Bango <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Today, we're proud to announce that the jQuery Project and Jack >>> Slocum's >>> Ext Project, have partnered to integrate the amazingly lightweight and >>> powerful jQuery framework with Ext's awesome UI library. >> <snip> >> >> I previously asked about DOM Query support [*]. And asking the same >> question:) >> >> [*] <news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> ( <http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-discuss/msg/ >> c74f44b95ac863cb> ) >> >> -- >> <?php echo 'Just another PHP saint'; ?> >> Email: rrjanbiah-at-Y!com Blog: http://rajeshanbiah.blogspot.com/ >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> jQuery mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://jquery.com/discuss/ >> > > _______________________________________________ > jQuery mailing list > [email protected] > http://jquery.com/discuss/ > _______________________________________________ jQuery mailing list [email protected] http://jquery.com/discuss/
-- Yehuda Katz Web Developer | Wycats Designs (ph) 718.877.1325
_______________________________________________ jQuery mailing list [email protected] http://jquery.com/discuss/
