I haven't tried it out just yet but will do that later on today.

Thanks for getting that to me. A good CF-based Taconite example will go 
a long way to getting some good examples into the new AjaxCFC for 
jQuery. I had dinner with Rob Gonda last night and put the pressure on 
him to get it out the door.

Rey...

Daemach wrote:
> Was the example I emailed ok Rey?  Let me know if you need something else.  I
> chose the addRows example because it involved something cf programmers are
> familiar with, namely dumping a query into a table.  It took me a while to
> figure out how to do that with DOM programming and with jQuery.  I also
> mixed dumping straight JS and using the eval function to run some jQuery to
> show the flexibility.
> 
> 
> Rey Bango-2 wrote:
>> Daemach,
>>
>> I'd be interested in seeing a sample of AjaxCFC for jQuery using 
>> taconite. Its something that I'm sure Rob Gonda would love to include in 
>> his sample apps for AjaxCFC.
>>
>> Can you email me a sample?
>>
>> Rey
>>
>> Daemach wrote:
>>> By the way, Mike Alsup just released a new plugin for jQuery called
>>> taconite
>>> that blends some of the best of CF and jQuery. Traditional ajax
>>> programming,
>>> for more complex operations such as building tables, interacting with DOM
>>> elements, etc. requires quite a bit of work and occasionally multiple
>>> operations to do what you need.  Taconite is a nice bridge - I'll let him
>>> explain further:  http://www.malsup.com/jquery/taconite/
>>>
>>> BTW, with this method you can get by with using $.ajax() as he describes,
>>> pulling the taconite objects straight from a .cfm page.  I still use
>>> ajaxCFC
>>> to handle the ajax side because I like the flexibility of going with
>>> whichever method is best suited for the job and because I like keeping
>>> specific functions wrapped in component methods. 
>>>   
>>>
>>> Rick Faircloth wrote:
>>>> A question for you CF & jQuery coders.
>>>>
>>>> What's the best (easiest) way to work with AJAX?
>>>>
>>>> ColdFusion or jQuery?
>>>>
>>>> Why?
>>>>
>>>> I would appreciate your insights.I haven't used AJAX, yet,
>>>> but I'm really interested in trying to figure it out.  It would
>>>> be especially useful in some of the web-based apps that I'm
>>>> building that would be used in place of traditional software.
>>>> Being able to avoid page changes and page refreshes would
>>>> go a long way in helping me sell people on the apps.
>>>>
>>>> Rick
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> jQuery mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://jquery.com/discuss/
>>>>
>>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> jQuery mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://jquery.com/discuss/
>>
>>
> 

_______________________________________________
jQuery mailing list
[email protected]
http://jquery.com/discuss/

Reply via email to