>> as for feature, proportional dimensions is a must IMO. There is no >> sense fixing width and height of thickbox in today's multitude of screen sizes...
>What exactly do you mean by that. Currently if an image is too large for the viewport it gets resized. Is it that? I took that >from the current Thickbox without any changes. I mean with TB, you specify its width and height by giving pixel values (width=600&height=400 for example). This is wrong: if the users has a 20000 pixel wide monitor (or a very small screen), TB should use whatever screen assets the user has. That is why width=90% is better. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Klaus Hartl Sent: mercredi 28 février 2007 14:49 To: jQuery Discussion. Subject: Re: [jQuery] ANNOUNCE: Thickbox Reloaded alpha Alexandre Plennevaux schrieb: > If filesize is to be TB biggest advantage, personally in fact i rarely > need to be able to launch a TB with iframe, ajax and images on the > same page, or even Application. > > I guess i'm not the only one to choose before hand at design time how > my app will use TB (ajax/iframe) to display interfaces. I would > therefore love to have 3 different thickbox plugins, so 3 different > files. If i need to mix, just adding the script source link to the > related TB version would enable me to. > > <script src="plugin.thickbox.images.js" > type="text/javascript"></script> <script src="plugin.thickbox.ajax.js" > type="text/javascript"></script> <script > src="plugin.thickbox.iframe.js" type="text/javascript"></script> > > this would also enable to build more functionalities for specific uses > (gallery, zoom, prev/next only apply to images). I just wrote in reply to Sam, that I'm thinking about making TR modular exactly like that. The basis is already there. On the other hand, for the Ajax example it just saves us 5 lines of code... > as for feature, proportional dimensions is a must IMO. There is no > sense fixing width and height of thickbox in today's multitude of screen sizes... What exactly do you mean by that. Currently if an image is too large for the viewport it gets resized. Is it that? I took that from the current Thickbox without any changes. > thank you! Thank you for feedback. And all the others! I hope we can build a Thickbox everybody (ok, hopefully most of us) is satisfied with! And while I'm at it, thanks to cody for letting us do this! -- klaus -- klaus _______________________________________________ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/ -- Ce message Envoi est certifié sans virus connu. Analyse effectuée par AVG. Version: 7.5.447 / Base de données virus: 268.18.4/705 - Date: 27/02/2007 15:24 _______________________________________________ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
