Sounds great Brandon. My only thought is that currently your plugin is nice and light which is great for such a useful utility plugin. Wouldn't adding all these features bump up the size to almost 200%?
On the other hand I'm sure you have weighed the pros and cons of this so... awesome! Joel. On 14/03/2007, at 12:45 AM, Brandon Aaron wrote: > I'm thinking about changing the name of offsetTop to top and > offsetLeft to left. I think it would be less confusing, less typing > and more representing of what they really are. :) > > -- > Brandon Aaron > > On 3/13/07, Brandon Aaron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Reading this has inspired me to update the bgiframe plugin. I'm going >> to have an options hash that can be passed in. The options will be: >> >> * offsetTop: auto || specific value >> * offsetLeft: auto || specific value >> * width: auto || specific value >> * height: auto || specific value >> * zIndex: -1 || specific value >> * tabIndex: -1 || specific value >> * src: 'javascript:false;' || specific value >> * className: 'bgiframe' || specific value >> >> The offsetTop and offsetLeft are automatically calculated as the >> border's width and height (depending on top or left). If you pass >> in a >> value for the offsetTop and offsetLeft, then the expressions used to >> calculate borders will not be included. Same applies for the width >> and >> height options. >> >> This will make the plugin more reusable across other plugins and >> sites. So instead of commenting out the expressions, you could just >> manually set and offsetTop and offsetLeft values for your particular >> situation. >> >> Feature/enhancement requests? >> >> Hopefully I can have something ready today but that depends on >> work. :) >> >> -- >> Brandon Aaron _______________________________________________ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
