Oh no, you're actually correct then. I thought you were asking if you could
compress the code with the documentation included, not the other way
around...

Yeah, since the compressed code is only meant to be used and not modified or
read, the documentation would be stripped, and therefore running any tool to
gather such information would return nothing I (or very little).

And that's if *my" understanding is correct :P Sorry if I confused you!


On 3/26/07, Christopher Jordan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Oh... that's exactly the reason I thought it *wouldn't* work. I don't
really understand javadocs... this is the first I've heard of them...
but it sounded like it took your comments and turned them into these
docs. I thought that since compressed js usually has the comments
stripped out, that it wouldn't work.

I'm probably dead wrong, and should have just lurked this conversation,
huh? ;o)

Chris

Kenneth wrote:
> It should as long as the compressor removes comments.
>
> On 3/26/07, *Christopher Jordan* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>
>     That wouldn't work for compressed JS would it?
>
>     Chris
>
>     Brian Cherne wrote:
>      > The Java engineers at my company told me about Javadoc... I
>     didn't even
>      > think to look for JSDoc... but it's essentially the same. I
haven't
>      > needed to extract the Javadoc code into a MSWord document, but I
>     think
>      > such tools already exist. I'll ask around. The other day when I
gave
>      > Aptana a trial-run I was happily surprised to see it reading my
>     Javadoc
>      > comments into a tooltip when I paused while thinking "what
>     parameters
>      > does this function take again"...
>      >
>      > But the biggest benefit is just in having consistent commenting
of
>      > functions. For instance, the Javadoc for my plug-in will read
>     something
>      > like:
>      >
>      > /**
>      > * hoverIntent is similar to jQuery's built-in "hover" function
>     except that
>      > * instead of firing the onMouseOver event immediately,
>     hoverIntent checks
>      > * to see if the user's mouse has slowed down over the object
>     (beneath the
>      > * sensitivity threshold) before firing the onMouseOver event.
>      > *
>      > * hoverIntent r4 // 2007.03.26 // jQuery 1.1.2
>      > * <http://cherne.net/brian/resources/jquery.hoverIntent.html
>     <http://cherne.net/brian/resources/jquery.hoverIntent.html>>
>      > *
>      > * hoverIntent is currently available for use in all personal or
>     commercial
>      > * projects under both MIT and GPL licenses. This means that you
>     can choose
>      > * the license that best suits your project, and use it
accordingly.
>      > *
>      > * // basic usage (just like .hover) receives onMouseOver and
>     onMouseOut
>      > functions
>      > * $("ul li").hoverIntent( showNav , hideNav );
>      > *
>      > * // advanced usage receives configuration object only
>      > * $("ul li").hoverIntent({
>      > *    sensitivity: 2, // number = sensitivity threshold (must be 1
or
>      > higher)
>      > *    interval: 50,   // number = milliseconds of polling interval
>      > *    over: showNav,  // function = onMouseOver callback
(required)
>      > *    timeout: 0,     // number = milliseconds delay before
onMouseOut
>      > function call
>      > *    out: hideNav    // function = onMouseOut callback (required)
>      > * });
>      > *
>      > * @param  f  onMouseOver function || An object with configuration
>     options
>      > * @param  g  onMouseOut function  || Nothing (use configuration
>     options
>      > object)
>      > * @return    The object (aka "this") that called hoverIntent, and
the
>      > event object
>      > * @author    Brian Cherne < [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>     <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>     <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>>
>      > */
>      > (function($) {
>      >     $.fn.hoverIntent = function(f,g) {
>      >        .... ....
>      >     };
>      > })(jQuery);
>      >
>      >
>      > Now that's rather verbose, but I'm sure it'll help a year from
>     now when
>      > I've forgotten all about it. :)
>      >
>      > Brian.
>      >
>      >
>      >
>      > On 3/26/07, *Matt Kruse* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>     <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>      > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>> wrote:
>      >
>      >      >- javadoc commenting of plug-in external interface
>      >
>      >     Using what tool? jsDoc?
>      >     I've found that jsDoc works great for class-based structures,
but
>      >     not so well for stand-along functions or library interfaces
like
>      >     jquery plugins. There should be some standard javadoc-style
>     syntax,
>      >     but not necessarily exactly as used in jsdoc.
>      >
>      >     In any event, I think all plugins should certainly have
>     embedded API
>      >     documentation, and the jquery.com <http://jquery.com>
>     <http://jquery.com> site itself
>      >     should be able to present each plugin's API docs in the same
>     format,
>      >     using the same tool.
>      >
>      >     I would also suggest implementing additional jquery-specific
doc
>      >     tags for dependencies, etc.
>      >
>      >     I've yet to find a tool that I really like to parse and
report on
>      >     these javadoc-style tags with the flexibility that I want. I
>     don't
>      >     even want a js parser - I can provide the full documentation,
>      >     function name, parameters, etc within my comments. So I
started
>      >     writing a tool in php that will output the documentation
>     on-the-fly.
>      >     Of course, it's about 10% done, like most things I start...
>      >
>      >     Matt
>      >
>      >
>      >     _______________________________________________
>      >     jQuery mailing list
>      >     discuss@jquery.com <mailto:discuss@jquery.com> <mailto:
>     discuss@jquery.com <mailto:discuss@jquery.com>>
>      >     http://jquery.com/discuss/ <http://jquery.com/discuss/>
>      >
>      >
>      >
>      >
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>      >
>      > _______________________________________________
>      > jQuery mailing list
>      > discuss@jquery.com <mailto:discuss@jquery.com>
>      > http://jquery.com/discuss/ <http://jquery.com/discuss/>
>
>     --
>     http://www.cjordan.us
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     jQuery mailing list
>     discuss@jquery.com <mailto:discuss@jquery.com>
>     http://jquery.com/discuss/
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> jQuery mailing list
> discuss@jquery.com
> http://jquery.com/discuss/

--
http://www.cjordan.us

_______________________________________________
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/

_______________________________________________
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/

Reply via email to