On Friday 27 April 2012 16:43:11 Arjan van de Ven wrote: > On 4/27/2012 1:44 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Friday 27 April 2012 16:34:53 Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > >> iw: handle HAVE_LIBNL20 properly > >> > >> Move HAVE_CONFIG_H and config.h inclusion to iw header file, which is > >> the right place for HAVE_LIBNL20 dependent `define nl_sock nl_handle'. > > > > glancing through the libnl headers, it seems we don't even need to manage > > HAVE_LIBNL20 in autoconf. we can include netlink/version.h and key off > > of LIBNL_VER_MAJ. > > one thing to note is that the iw.c code is borrowed from elsewhere... > > the more we deviate, the harder it will be to follow the other code > (not that we needed to so far)
hmm, no biggie. the file is small, and my suggestion isn't critical, so keeping current stuff is ok. -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lesswatts.org http://lists.lesswatts.org/listinfo/discuss
