In my opinion, the editor checklist ( https://tools.ipol.im/wiki/ref/editor_checklist/) is not clear about what has to be verified in the demo. Indeed, it is not obvious at all that the code of the demo has to be checked. Looking at the demo section of of the editor checklist, one rather thinks that one has to check the consistent working of the demo through the preprint web page.
By the way, I think the editor check list is also lacking with respect to the c/c++ code. I think we should add a section for that specifically or maybe merge it with the demo section. There we can also add a link to the software guidelines https://tools.ipol.im/wiki/ref/software_guidelines/ Best On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 2:10 PM, Miguel Colom <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear all, > the "Editor checklist" in the IPOL Wiki contains instructions for the > editors to check both the demo and and manuscript. > > These instructions are easy to find, but the detailed instructions to > verify the demos are at https://tools.ipol.im/wiki/doc/demo/guidelines/ > and it's not evident at all for the editors that thery should look there to > find them. > > I propose to add a link from the first page to the detailed instructions, > if you all agree. > > Best, > Miguel > > > -- > IPOL - Image Processing On Line - http://ipol.im/ > > contact [email protected] - http://www.ipol.im/meta/contact/ > news+feeds twitter @IPOL_journal - http://www.ipol.im/meta/feeds/ > announces [email protected] - http://tools.ipol.im/mm/announce/ > discussions [email protected] - http://tools.ipol.im/mm/discuss/ >
-- IPOL - Image Processing On Line - http://ipol.im/ contact [email protected] - http://www.ipol.im/meta/contact/ news+feeds twitter @IPOL_journal - http://www.ipol.im/meta/feeds/ announces [email protected] - http://tools.ipol.im/mm/announce/ discussions [email protected] - http://tools.ipol.im/mm/discuss/
