Quoting Jean-Michel Morel <moreljeanmic...@gmail.com>:
Dear all,
Enric is absolutely right to ask for a formal vote on a final text.
The preparation of the text might be done with an online google doc?
All right, then.
I'll create a Google Doc with the proposed text and I'll send the link
to edit it.
Best,
Miguel
Jean-Michel Morel
moreljeanmic...@gmail.com
On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 10:47 AM, Loic Simon <loic.si...@ensicaen.fr> wrote:
Dear Miguel, Dear Enric,
I think that Miguel should send a draft of his proposed modifications and
it can be validated/amended by editorial board members without need of a
meeting. That would allow to at least correct quickly the misleading
information, and we can start a sound discussion on other points on which
there is no consensus.
Best,
Loïc
On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 10:41 AM, Miguel Colom <co...@cmla.ens-cachan.fr>
wrote:
Quoting Enric Meinhardt-Llopis <enric.meinha...@cmla.ens-cachan.fr>:
Dear all,
You are talking about major changes to IPOL here. Should we summon
the whole editorial board to approve these changes? (arrange a
meeting, or send a mail to everybody with a poll to explicitly accept
each of the changes)
Maybe not all the people in the editorial board are reading this
mailing list, or maybe they are not reading it this week.
I want to have a voice in these changes but I'm not sure that this
mailing list reaches everybody.
Dear Enric,
I think that to remove the false information in the IPOL pages (Software
Guidelines, FAQ, help, etc.) is urgente and should be done now. Some of
that false claims are that we don't support MATLAB, among others. We
wouldn't be deciding anything new, but just correcting the docs.
About summoning all the Editorial Board or emailing them, as you wish.
My opinion is that we should be way more agile, in the sense that if we
detect that our information is false, that we can improve it quickly, and
someone has already taken the responsibility to do it, then it should be
done immediately.
I'm afraid that if we don't be that agile, most of the time things won't
be done at all because we'll be waiting for eventual discussions that won't
ever happen and in the worst case this wait will block the actions.
My proposal is to simply update the docs and to rearrange some parts
(move the C/++ to a dedicated part).
Given said that, if you really think that it's necessary that all the
Editorial Board votes, let's do that then. I'm not opposed at all.
Best,
Miguel
Best,
Enric
2017-07-04 16:10 GMT+02:00, Jose Luis Lisani <joseluis.lis...@uib.es>:
I agree with Miguel suggestions about the Submission Procedure and the
Software Guidelines.
I can update the information appearing in the web page, but first we
should all agree in the new guidelines.
--
IPOL - Image Processing On Line - http://ipol.im/
contact e...@ipol.im - http://www.ipol.im/meta/contact/
news+feeds twitter @IPOL_journal - http://www.ipol.im/meta/feeds/
announces annou...@list.ipol.im - http://tools.ipol.im/mm/announce/
discussions discuss@list.ipol.im - http://tools.ipol.im/mm/discuss/
--
IPOL - Image Processing On Line - http://ipol.im/
contact e...@ipol.im - http://www.ipol.im/meta/contact/
news+feeds twitter @IPOL_journal - http://www.ipol.im/meta/feeds/
announces annou...@list.ipol.im - http://tools.ipol.im/mm/announce/
discussions discuss@list.ipol.im - http://tools.ipol.im/mm/discuss/
--
IPOL - Image Processing On Line - http://ipol.im/
contact e...@ipol.im - http://www.ipol.im/meta/contact/
news+feeds twitter @IPOL_journal - http://www.ipol.im/meta/feeds/
announces annou...@list.ipol.im - http://tools.ipol.im/mm/announce/
discussions discuss@list.ipol.im - http://tools.ipol.im/mm/discuss/
--
IPOL - Image Processing On Line - http://ipol.im/
contact e...@ipol.im - http://www.ipol.im/meta/contact/
news+feeds twitter @IPOL_journal - http://www.ipol.im/meta/feeds/
announces annou...@list.ipol.im - http://tools.ipol.im/mm/announce/
discussions discuss@list.ipol.im - http://tools.ipol.im/mm/discuss/
