Speaking of this, The Toronto Symphony is performing Apalacian Spring from their homes. https://youtu.be/5rzZ2F18MwI
While they all played at the same time, their videos and audios were spliced for synchrization purposes -- Jerry Feldman <[email protected]> Boston Linux and Unix PGP key id: 537C5846 PGP Key fingerprint: 3D1B 8377 A3C0 A5F2 ECBB CA3B 4607 4319 537C 5846 On Fri, Apr 3, 2020, 12:48 PM Daniel Barrett <[email protected]> wrote: > On April 2, 2020, Rich Pieri wrote: > >Daniel Barrett <[email protected]> wrote: > >> How about software that lets a group rapidly record themselves > >> individually, and share files seamlessly? Playback is all local so > >> there's no latency issue, based on what I've read. > > > >While this probably works for recording music it's not at all the same > >as an ensemble performing music or practicing together. > > Yes, clearly they are not the same. :-) (FYI, I've been a musician for > 50 years.) But these kinds of packages provide an intriguing halfway > point between individual recording (a solitary, batch-oriented affair) > and live performance (immediate feedback) if the file sharing is rapid > and seamless. > > After all, if you're singing all by yourself in a room, and you hear > 10 of your friends' voices over a speaker at the same time, how much > does it matter if those 10 people are actually singing NOW or if they > finished singing 2 minutes earlier and software synched their tracks > to your computer? The answer to that question is a personal > preference. You lose some spontaneity (your friends can't react to > your singing) but you gain absolute zero latency. It's a trade-off. > > Dan > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
