On Wed, 06 May 2026 21:57:09 -0400 "Dale R. Worley" <[email protected]> wrote:
> The difficulty is that the actual market for "creativity" is fairly > small; most "creative types" are employed as "illustrators", that is, > the customer wants some sort of IP that has certain properties, > doesn't care about how unique it is, and is price-sensitive. The > result is you get e.g. I don't know about that. I do know plenty of actors, musicians, artists, writers, etc., who are in demand for their work. I also see that when companies try to use machine-generated "art" instead of employing human artists, it is met with backlash and ridicule from the audiences. I also know several novelists who have written into their contracts that no machine-generated content is permitted: covers must be illustrated by humans, translations must be performed by humans, etc. My impression is that "art" by Nano Banana 2 might be good enough for some CEO who only cares about shareholder value. Not so much for the rest of us. -- \m/ (--) \m/ _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
