Also wenn sie den Focus mehr auf Stabilität und Dokumentation legen wollen, kann man das doch nur gutheißen, oder?
2016-05-04 9:04 GMT+02:00 Paul Fuxjaeger <[email protected]>: > hier finden alle die Idee gut, denn die zentralen openwrt devs stehen > dahinter. Die Communities sind gestern eingeladen worden ein Endorsement > abzugeben. Würde dann auf https://www.lede-project.org/ unten aufscheinen. > > Was haltet ihr davon? Gibt's einen guten Grund ein Endorsement NICHT zu > machen? Ich sehe grad keinen. > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On 04 May 2016, at 05:29, David Hopfmueller <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> FYI: bei OpenWrt tut sich was. >> >> CU, >> David >> >> -------- Forwarded Message -------- >> Subject: [OpenWrt-Devel] Introducing the LEDE project >> Date: Tue, 3 May 2016 18:59:55 +0100 >> From: Jo-Philipp Wich <[email protected]> >> To: OpenWrt Development List <[email protected]>, OpenWrt User >> List <[email protected]> >> >> Hi, >> >> we'd like to introduce LEDE, a reboot of the OpenWrt community >> . >> >> The project is founded as a spin-off of the OpenWrt project and shares >> many of the same goals. >> >> >> We are building an embedded Linux distribution that makes it easy for >> developers, system administrators or other Linux enthusiasts to build >> and customize software for embedded devices, especially wireless routers. >> The name 'LEDE' stands for 'Linux Embedded Development Environment'. >> >> >> >> Members of the project already include a significant share of the most >> active members of the OpenWrt community. >> We intend to bring new life to Embedded Linux development by creating a >> community with a strong focus on transparency, collaboration and >> decentralisation. >> >> >> >> LEDE’s stated goals are: >> >> >> - Building a great embedded Linux distribution with focus on stability >> and functionality. >> >> - Having regular, predictable release cycles coupled with community >> provided device testing feedback. >> >> - Establishing transparent decision processes with broad community >> participation and public meetings. >> >> >> >> We decided to create this new project because of long standing issues >> that we were unable to fix from within the OpenWrt project/community: >> >> >> 1. Number of active core developers at an all time low, no process for >> getting more new people involved. >> >> 2. Unreliable infrastructure, fixes prevented by internal disagreements >> and single points of failure. >> >> 3. Lack of communication, transparency and coordination in the OpenWrt >> project, both inside the core team and between the core team and the >> rest of the community. >> >> 4. Not enough people with commit access to handle the incoming flow of >> patches, too little attention to testing and regular builds. >> >> 5. Lack of focus on stability and documentation. >> >> >> >> To address these issues we set up the LEDE project in a different way >> compared to OpenWrt: >> >> >> 1. All our communication channels are public, some read-only to >> non-members to maintain a good signal-to-noise ratio. >> >> 2. Our decision making process is more open, with an approximate 50/50 >> mix of developers and power users with voting rights. >> >> 3. Our infrastructure is simplified a lot, to ensure that it creates >> less maintenance work for us. >> >> 4. We have made our merge policy more liberal, based on our experience >> with the OpenWrt package github feed. >> >> 5. We have a strong focus on automated testing combined with a >> simplified release process >> >> If you're interested in participating or want to learn more about the >> project, check out https://www.lede-project.org/. >> >> >> Sincerely, >> >> Jo-Philipp Wich, >> John Crispin, >> Daniel Golle, >> >> Felix Fietkau, >> >> Hauke Mehrtens >> >> John Crispin >> >> Matthias Schiffer, >> >> Steven Barth >> _______________________________________________ >> openwrt-devel mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel >> >> -- >> Discuss mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.funkfeuer.at/mailman/listinfo/discuss > > > -- > Discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.funkfeuer.at/mailman/listinfo/discuss -- Discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.funkfeuer.at/mailman/listinfo/discuss
