"Garrett D'Amore" <[email protected]> wrote:
> c) iconv -- perhaps we can use GNU version? (Though truth be told, I'd
> prefer to have a different implementation, just because its good for
> there to be at least one other implementation on the planet in use.)
I would like to avoid any GNU code in the basic OS.
Let me start with some questions:
1) Is my first impression correct that we have the "complete" iconf
code sources in libc?
2) How could we get missing files from /usr/lib/iconv?
3) Is there anybody who has more in depth knowledge on this topic?
Writing an iconf program that does not need to implement the -l option
may be relatively simple....
> d) kbdcomp -- seems to share code with iconv?
Good question, do you know the purpose of this program?
Jörg
--
EMail:[email protected] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
[email protected] (uni)
[email protected] (work) Blog:
http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.illumos.org/m/listinfo/discuss
